Are you inspired by Alex Vero's ambitions, or slightly insulted?

1235725

Comments

  • Dad of Two; if he inspires you all well and good. But I agree with Tom, he will not achieve 2h.15m. Look at his recent half mara times. It takes much more to progress from 2h30m to 2h15m than from 3h30m to 2h30m. And yes I realise I've jumped from a 60 to 15 minute improvement.
    Time will tell.
  • Tom.Tom. ✭✭✭
    BR, apologies....assertion was made from memory...seems like the old faculties are fading. Sounds like a case of "if you don't use it, you lose it".

    Zoe, I'm a great admirer of those who give it all they've got, and I'd like to think that those who know me, would see me as the same. Everyone who steps out the door in an effort to improve themselves runningwise deserves respect - that's you, me and all the other people on this forum who buy into the idea of self improvement from commitment and effort. The thing that gets me on my high horse is the idea that someone can command respect and admiration simply by saying what's he's going to do. If he delivers than he most certainly will command my respect. However I believe that I have enough knowledge about what it takes to know that what Alex says can't be done. In summsry I admire commitment and effort but I get really irritated by people who think that its all about wanting it badly enough and shouting it loudly enough. From a personal point of view I could tell every one that I'm capable of running (say) a sub 2:40 marathon and I want to do it really, really badly aand will do anything it takes....what do I get in return, lots of wishes of good luck...totally worthless, since I'm incapaple of achieving my objective.

    Hilly, in one sentence you say "I don't think anyone should place limits on what they can achieve" and in another you say "Yes, I know we all have a ceiling". Perhaps you'd like to reconcile those two points of view. From my own viewpoint I agree with your second statement that we do have ceilings. However I believe those ceilings should be attainable and not hopelessly out of reach.

    On a more personal level, for you early 2006 was a remarkable period in which your level of performance shifted significantly - I think I was one of the few people who suggested that your additude to running would never be quite the same again. I think it would also be fair to say that your level of performance for this year has made you wonder whether you can get back to those "glory days". I suspect that you believe you can, and in the spirit of this thread I wish you luck in your efforts. Similarly, I also had a purple patch in 2005, difference is, I think that those days are lost to me for ever. Perhaps thats the difference between me and you (and most of the othe people who post on this thread). I think it's lost, they think that its recoveable and that anything is possible. You may take the view that that reflects my pessimism whereas I should be mirroring the optimism of my fellow posters.

    Finally to dispell the ambiguity of the Folkestone sub 50 comment. Two years ago, before you and BR were an item, he and Pantman ran the Folkestone 10M - the head to head between the "forum giants". Unfortunately neither BR or Pantman ran to expectations, and in the aftermath of the race, and in response to some comments I made on the subject of unrealistic expectations (similar to my views expressed on this thread), Pantman posted the following......

    ...."Tom - put your money where your mouth is!! If I break 50min in the next 24 months (up to and inc. Folkestone 10 2007) will you take myself, my lovely wife and my five hungry kids out to our favourite local eatery? Surely, you'll agree - surely it is safe money> ;-) And, no, I won't be offering anything if I don't do it - I never said I would!
    But for the record, I believe I will and I don't consider it unrealistic."

    On the basis of my current knowledge of Pantman's activities, I don't think he has delivered on his boast. It also of course encapsulates my views expressed on all the issues raised on thisvthread.

    Well, I think that just about does it for me.
  • I do think if he truly believed he was capable of 2.15 himself, it would not be necessary to be so bold about it. It does appear as though he feels he needs to convince other people, and if he was really so determined to get 2.15 it would not matter what others thought of him. So if it is what it appears an advertisement for his film company, fair play he might get some work out of it. As a few others have said i think the timescale more than anything else will go against him. If he had the talent to get 2.15 in a year he would not be begging for sponsorship money etc. Also with the standards apparently being raised at the moment, together with improving HM times for a number of athletes i can see sub 2.14 being needed atleast rather than 2.15.

    Just thought i'd quote the Steve Ovett autobiography im reading at the moment..."any idiot can become an Olympic champion provided that they have a lot of luck, work hard and cross the finish line first in the final"!
    I dont think personally you require a great amount of skill for running, which is why comparing running to sports such as football & cricket is pointless. Alot of the most successfull runners came to athletics after being incapable at other sports. It is an individual sport so you get out what you put in, but i think genetics do eventually put a limit on what you can achieve

    Im sitting on the fence on this one! I cant see why runners are being offended though he comes across more ignorant than arrogant... If Steven Gerrard or Wayne Rooney (i hate them both!) heard about an unknown just about playing amateur level, saying they were going to get in the England football team they would laugh about it. Its very unlikely he'll get 2.15 on his current progress maybe sub 2.30 in 2008, but as i dont know him, trained or raced against him i dont think id be in a position to judge either, id still put a bet on him not doing it if anyone fancied taking me up though!?
  • HillyHilly ✭✭✭
    Very interesting and well written post Tom.

    Placing a limitation is a negative thing - ie `I will never run a 2:15 marathon'. I don't think that way. That is not the same as saying we all have a ceilng. I just prefer not to pluck a number from the air to apply to that ceiling.

    Thank you for clarifying the Folkestone 10 comment (where BR says he beat Pantman, Big Tim and Micksta whilst running the best he could on the day under stressful circumstances which unravelled at FLM within a month).

    As for my purple patch I'm confident enough to say watch this space - there will be more. Maybe not such big improvements as I made last time but I believe there's still more left in me and I still have the drive and determination I had back then. I've yet to reach my ceiling!
  • A forum giant writes...

    Tom - I never called myself any such name - I think you're referring to a comment made by Micksta after the HBO 10k last year. Keep going and you'll have attributed the Declaration of Independence, the Gettysburg Address and the `We'll fight them on the beaches' statements to me by tea time today:-))

    To amplify the ceiling point - I'm smart enough in my heart to know I'll never run a sub 2:30 marathon. I don't think in those terms though. I think I can improve on what I have achieved but don't like to bandy numbers around - just to train as race as best I can given the hand I hold.
  • Sprinting Toffee - the comparison with other sports is valid.

    In cricket a keen eye and excellent hand / eye co-ordination are necessary for success at the top level. One would need to add hours of practice and training on top of that to make it.

    In running, rather than hand / eye skill, a high Vo2 max, high LT and excellent biomechanics are pre-requisites for elite performance.

    The principle is the same - genetic gifts, be they ball based or CV based, on top of which is needed years of training.
  • BR - what i ment was cricket, football etc are highly skilled sports as you say, but i dont think running is a highly skilled sport...im not saying skill is not involved at all, but not to the same extent in my opinion...
  • if your just saying that alot of training is required for them all fair enough, but you could make that comparison with a lot of things business, science etc i just dont think they are similar... id bracket cricket, football with sports like rugby, basketball etc (alot of others!) whereas running is pretty much out on its own, maybe closer to cycling more than anything but even that requires more skill than running...
  • I'm not sure I would agree with that. You learn things everytime you train and especially with race you run, things that you can't get from reading a book or talking to a coach. A footballer can be told and shown how to shape his foot and where to strike the ball to bend it but needs to do it over and over again to be able to replicate it in a match. Likewise to (for example) run a negative split in a marathon - all the talk in the world won't replace actually going out and doing it. It may not be an obvious skill (like trapping a ball) but it is a skill nonetheless.
  • JoolskaJoolska ✭✭✭
    Time to chip in with my tuppence ha'penny...

    sprinting toffee - think I have to agree with amadeus; just because there isn't an obvious physical skill (throwing, catching, etc.) doesn't mean that running isn't incredibly skilled: pace judgment, both when racing and training, is key. Tactically, knowing when to surge and when to reign things in, etc. It's still about teaching muscles what to do, it's just that we tend to think of running as simple because it's something we all know how to do.

    It would be like saying singing is easier than playing the violin/trumpet/piano on the basis that most of us can manage a bit of basic singing, but wouldn't have much of chance of sounding half-decent when we first picked up a trumpet. But to say because of that, that singing is easier than playing a musical instrument, when done properly, is wrong. And it's just the same with running or any other sport. Yes, there is undoubtedly talent involved, but also hard work, usually for years.

    This is why Vero, in all likelihood, will not achieve his goals (neither time, nor being on the team). He can try, and as far as I'm concerned, he can make as much song and dance about it in the process as he wants: ultimately, the people who make the team in 2008, 2012, etc., are the people who have that combination of talent and graft (and maybe a small bit of luck). If Vero's story makes people realise the years of graft it takes to make it to the top, maybe it will have a positive effect long-term. I don't see that, ultimately, that diminshes our sport.
  • JoolskaJoolska ✭✭✭
    or even diminishes!
  • The UK Athletics policy for selection is quite complicated. The policy for Bejiing has not been announced yet, but very likely it will be not as soft as in previous years. It is very unlikely UK Athletics will send a developing athletes for the marathon. At present, besides Mo Farah we do not have a swift young 10000m prospect who would be a possible candidate. This means bad news for a lot of 2:16-2:18 runners too, who are much closer to making it to the Olympics. The A standard is 2:12 and would have ideally achieved on multiple occassions. Only Jon Browne has demonstrated that so far and if he does not get injured will likely make it. Dan Robinson is possibly another candidate due to his championship podium record (CG). Most of the other top runners would need to clock some serious fast times, much faster than they previously ran. However, this is very unlikely too, to make that happen you would need to committ to full time running, but without funding and support it is not going to happen. Maintain a part of full time job will affect your recovery and performance. I guess all this puts it in perspective. It would be fantastic if a nobody would break through the top. In the past we had Tracey Morris or more recently Felicity Milton who made it to major championships due to soft qualification standards and lack of competition at the top end.
  • jools b - I like the singing/ playing the trumpet comparison!:-) point taken, its all about opinions!! I just think sometimes people make running more complicated than it is, which can then put people off aiming for high targets... i agree with what BR(?) said on the last page about 2.30 being an attainable target for a fit u30 male, although i dont see why this couldnt be stretched to an u35... im 23 by the way so im not just trying to include myself there!
  • I have read Alex Vero's website, and he says:
    My short term aim is to run the Paris Marathon in a time of 2 hours 30 minutes, becoming one of the top 40 Marathon runners in the UK. If I can achieve this goal I will have some of the funds needed to produce the documentary and explore what it takes to get from a very good club marathon runner to an Olympic athlete. In no way do I have any intention of degrading the UK elite marathon runners of this generation or anyone that has every tried before. I want to shed light on the hardships, sacrifices and the dedication that it take to get to the top of this most gruelling sport. Even if I run the qualifying time in 2008 there is a chance that I will not be selected due to my lack of experience. If I don't achieve my target it will show that you need that something else to get to the top as I can assure you that it will not be through lack of perseverance or hard work. If I do reach my goal then it opens up a whole new debate as to what really is possible, and I hope that it will inspire others to challenge their own perceived limitations.

    I honestly can't see anything wrong with that.
  • URR - Andrew Lemoncello ran 28:28 at the weekend. He's pretty young and seems to improve as distances increase. I understand he'll have another year in Grad School in FSU so can continue training without too much work stress.
  • I think the fact that at the elite level they talk about 2:15 being a "soft" target says it all really!
  • As Hilly said, it would make a nice break from the wife swap big brother celebrity doumentaries!
  • JEJ - I know, Lemo is not even a road runner, used to be a S/C. His training is not marathon specific at this stage. Tom Lancashire ran a useful time in the 5k too. More likely a prospect for 2012, long way to go.
  • Jonny Mellor(aged 20) is a good local prospect hes just ran 29.48 at the Trafford 10k not far behind Pete Riley in 'windy' conditions!!!
  • Mellor is very good and running some excellent times and may be in shape for 2012, but on the flip-side, at nationals he lost to Deighton, Russel and Swinburn. He's good but not that much better than the other good lads in his age group. Pepper, Hickey, Deighton, Carey are all stronger in my opinion. Also Riley was struggling with injury. Mellor has maybe a 1 in a 1000 shot at being ready for Beijing over any distance. When you consider that, for a 20 year old who's already run sub 30 for 10k you get a sense of the sort of challenge Vero has to climb.

    Whilst Vero is very quick to always point out that it is a veyr small chance of qualifying, why on earth has he entitled his website the road to Beijing rather than the road to London? He's just advertising off of the olympics.

    URR- Agree Lemoncello is not marathon specific, but he's unarguably a swift young 10,000m runner! He'll try to qualify in steeple (I'm not sure he's totally put that behind him yet) or 10,000.

    Over last two years...major talent has been Moumin Geele. Not sure what he's doing atm, but he's got the credentials if you believe his 10 mile time to run a fast marathon given a certain level of improvement.

    Last person I can think of and no idea if he's planning it or not but it wouldn't surprise me. Frank Tickner, finished with uni, wouldn't surprise me to see a campaign by him to run a marathon and try and get in the team.
  • Hey Bryn, he seems to perform better on the road than xc... at the weekend he ran 1 minute 20 seconds quicker than sminburn to come home first on the first leg of the northern relays http://www.race-results.co.uk/results/2007/n1207.htm i cant see deightons name on the results so i dont think he was there, would be interesting what he could do in a 10k at the moment. It was a shame Riley was injured for the nationals as it would have been good to see him against Tickner. I think vero's best bet would be to focus on 800/1500 time but he seems set on Beijing!
  • Mellor is awesome. If Vero spent less time on the internet and more time topping up his suntan on the Wirral he'd be in with a shout.
  • hahaha... topping up his tan o the Wirral, it ain't that hot here today mate ;-)


    Pug
  • Well, 3 days until the big event... I've had an email off him and I'm sure he won't mind me posting it on here:

    Hi Mark

    Thanks very much for the advice. I am heading off on Saturday morning on the
    Eurostar so should be all pretty easy as I live 5 mins from waterloo and the
    hotel is 5 mins from the start line. I am feeling great at the moment and
    had a good session with my coach today consisting of 300's just to get a
    little bit of speed back into the legs. The taper seems to be working a
    treat and I think I will be peaking at just the right time. I am going to
    stick to the plan as you said and run restrained till at least 20 miles
    where I still want to be feeling good. I will certainly let you know my race
    number and will be in touch after the race to let you know how I get on.
    Best of luck with the rest of your training and stay focused. Thanks very
    much for all the support to date and I hope that come next week I would have
    posted a time to be pleased with.

    Best wishes

    Alex


    He's feeling good... and looks like he's going for a 1:19 - 1:17 split I think (although I may be wrong, can't remember 100%)... good luck to him I say ;-)

    I'm predicting a 2:37:44


    Pug
  • Anyone know how he got on?
  • Isn't Paris tomorrow? I may be wrong.
  • Tomorrow, he's sending me a text so I'll let you know ;-)


    Pug
  • it looks like he went through halfway in 385th position split of 1.22
  • GobiGobi ✭✭✭
    where are people getting the updates ?
  • N° 1420 Alexandre VERO Cat. SH
    kilometre Temps de passage Position
    km 10 09h 23' 59" 463th
    km 21 10h 07' 14" 385th
Sign In or Register to comment.