Moraghan Training - Stevie G

1135113521354135613571916

Comments

  • CC82CC82 ✭✭✭
    Just catching up (as usual).

    Had a read back but too many things to mention.

    Superb Ironman from Reg and Marathon from Matt.

    Congratulations to Scott!  All the best - hope it's the start of good things to come for you!

    Running wise for me - just under 2 weeks after the marathon, I ran a 3k race in 10:05.  A bit off the PB of 9:52 but in that marathon recovery phase and off no speedwork, I was happy enough.  Ran a Parkrun on Saturday (8 days later) in 18:09 and took first place at Ellon Parkrun (for my first 1st at Parkrun and second time I've finished 1st in a "race").  Again, relatively pleased with that as it's an SB at 5k but I was really hoping to go sub 18 (with my PB on a much faster course being 17:27).

    Worst part was I slipped during the parkrun and put my back out.  I was in agony on Sunday but it's eased off now.  Physio last night and I've got a lot of tightness in my QL muscle in my back and my left hip flexor.  A lot stemming from sitting on my arse all day.  Got some stretches to do and I'm now confident it will be fine.  Heading out for a relaxed 3 miler at lunchtime to see how it's all feeling.
  • The Bus said:

    tiddlywinks is far too dangerous

    Talking of tiddlywinks, I see a fresh outbreak of arbitrary world records so someone has broken the "800 MARATHONS WORLD RECORD" so is apparently "First person to average sub 3:20 for 800 official marathon races!".

    Seems that you can pick pretty arbitrary definitions nowadays so e.g. run 26.2 miles round Dorney Lake with a handful of friends = official marathon. 


    Or possibly..'Oh look at me!! look at me! 'I'm not actually that good at running and not got enough moral fibre to train harder to get faster..so I'll peel off and do something that I can be the bestest at!!

    Bit harsh perhaps :)  Dachs - still a good xc though all things considered, setting a high bar at the moment to be honest. Deano - same..you'll get there soon. CC82, good bit of speed post marathon then (my mate always used to be the same too..). SG - Mental session again!! hardcore on the track.

  • CC82CC82 ✭✭✭
    So - relaxed 3 miler turned into a 4 miler by accident.  On autopilot I turned left when I should have turned right (I never run less than 4 miles!) and before I remembered I was only going to do 3 miles it was too late.  Pretty relaxed affair - all moving pretty well.  Came out overall 7:32, progressing from 7:55 through to 7:20.  Back still a little stiff, but definitely nothing to get overly concerned with. :smile:
  • DachsDachs ✭✭✭

    All sounds pretty smooth for a post-marathon period CC.

    PMJ, to be fair I think the bloke is running official marathons rather than just a bunch of training runs with friends, and it is a pretty swift average, but I still struggle to see the attraction of the whole thing.  We've got a bloke in our club who's done 900.  Official ones.  Madness.

    Dean, I sympathise with your XC woes.  It seems to find you out if you aren't right.

    More track tempos then SG?  Time for a track 10,000?

    TVXCers, the Reading fixture has been finalised, and after being run out of our normal course at Crowthorne, the new course will be a park local to me, which is where I have done my XC training for a few years.  I've always said, including on here, that it would make a good XC course, and now we will find out.  Not sure if it was picked on my recommendation, although I did put it forward to them to consider.  Just done some light fartlek round there and it's firm at the minute, although be warned that, if there's been any real rain at all, much of the course will turn into a bog very quickly.  I have returned from training there in the past with entirely brown legs.

  • PeteMPeteM ✭✭✭
    Simon/Philip, Talking of mad records there was a guy at the end of CP10 on Sunday came over to our little group boasting of how he had just run it in about 73 mins in flip-flops, proudly showing off the said footwear which were indeed just like anyone would wear to the beach. When I realised he was serious I was pretty damn impressed, however crazy trying to run 10 miles like that is. He expounded merrily that he had already done a half in them too and was after the world marathon record for flip flop wearers at London 2018. Checked online and someone has done a 2'46 (does that still count as "can't run fast" Simon :*) albeit not at London so he might get a VLM record but surely no chance of a World one :)

    Impressive 28 solo tempo laps of the track SG; mental strength needed for that little lot is far more than for doing a parkrun then a 10 mile race the next day! 

    Good parkrun 'win' CC; shorter distance should improve further once you're over the marathon 
  • Or possibly..'Oh look at me!! look at me! 'I'm not actually that good at running and not got enough moral fibre to train harder to get faster..so I'll peel off and do something that I can be the bestest at!!

    Bit harsh perhaps :) 

    I don't mind a bit of self-publicity and he seems to have raised a fair chunk for charity but it is the world record claim that irks me. There is no official world record for running a load of marathons at a semi-decent pace. Look at a host of other runners who have to work with FKT (fastest known times) 
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    Pete, it was the mental strength of doing it again this second week! Having looked back to 2010, I did a string of these 7mile efforts. Will have to see if i have a 3rd next week.
    Back then of course they were at least on the road, or round a longer loop...

    Dachs, Reading seem to struggle to hold the same venue don't they? Had a course i can't remember, the posh school, and maybe somewhere else before Crowthorne? Now, just some random park? Lap job?

    I ask this as i've done about 1 event in 3 years, and can't pretend i fancy a string of em this time either...

    hang on....900 marathons? And official ones? Are there even 50 a year? So 18 years of one every week? Madness.
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    Fair enough after that clarification Philip. Each to their own though - which is actually harder, or more impressive: a sub 32 minute 10k or 800 marathons? Most are way beyond the reach of most people either through lack of talent, determination or shear physical ability. Both are actually hard AND impressive, but still no where near the fastest or mostest for either, so you might ask why bother with trying at either?

    CC - glad it wasn't serious and sounds like you are coming back from the marathon fine.

    SG - cracking tempo again!

    Went to the sports injury specialist fella today. Same guy who diagnosed and got my degenerative disc under control about ten years back. He did a pretty wide range of diagnostic exercises on my, the weirdest of whihc involved me standing in front of him with my shorts peeled down whilst he prodded me in the groin and pubic bone and asked me to cough! 

    He suspects the problem is either a bony protusion on the hip, causing impingement or an occult hernia (as far as I can gather this is a small abnormality in the abdomen letting fatty deposits pop through in a bulge and pressing on the tendons). I have an X-ray and ultrasound in a couple of weeks to try and confirm. I'd rather it was the hip thing, as that can be eased by traction and exercise, whereas the hernia would require an op.  I suspect the latter though,a s it hurts when I sneeze....

    All that poking and prodding made for an uncomfortable 7.5M xc after. The knee was uncomfortable again as well, despite no pain whatsoever on Saturday's LSR,  but it did ease after a few miles.



  • CC82CC82 ✭✭✭
    900 marathons does indeed sound absolutely mental.  I mean, if you do one run per day, it will take the guts of 3 years to even run 900 times.

    According to Po10, I've ran a grand total of 60 official races (which includes Parkruns - 12 of them, I think).
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    The Bus said:


    SG - cracking tempo again!

    Went to the sports injury specialist fella today. Same guy who diagnosed and got my degenerative disc under control about ten years back. He did a pretty wide range of diagnostic exercises on my, the weirdest of whihc involved me standing in front of him with my shorts peeled down whilst he prodded me in the groin and pubic bone and asked me to cough! 

    He suspects the problem is either a bony protusion on the hip, causing impingement or an occult hernia (as far as I can gather this is a small abnormality in the abdomen letting fatty deposits pop through in a bulge and pressing on the tendons). I have an X-ray and ultrasound in a couple of weeks to try and confirm. I'd rather it was the hip thing, as that can be eased by traction and exercise, whereas the hernia would require an op.  I suspect the latter though,a s it hurts when I sneeze....

    All that poking and prodding made for an uncomfortable 7.5M xc after. The knee was uncomfortable again as well, despite no pain whatsoever on Saturday's LSR,  but it did ease after a few miles.




    That made me chuckle, sounds like the mythical test that worried us for a year at school!
    Must feel a little creepy, just alone with some guy head near your crotch poking you around.

    The ultrasound one was quite awkward, where some doc hangs behind you almost spooning you, while digging a scanner into your ribs having glooped you up with some sort of mush.
    Had that test twice. Once because the proper people didn't trust the Cressex lot.

    That was one long year of tests thinking back... 4-5 ECGs, normal and 48hours, 2 of the above ones, blood pressure a few times, a rib X ray, a stress test on the treadmill, blood test, 2 MRIs.
    At one stage the specialist suggested some invasive device sitting on top of the heart..to "Monitor" things. 
    Wowzers.

    ps, glad there's some very specific reasoning for your woes though. You need that before it can heal, so all good progress.
    I wouldn't worry or pre cursor the hernia thing though. I had tight muscles in the lower stomach once that a sneeze would reverb through. Just stretching alone finally saw that off. At one stage i was drinking some gloop that while not true laxatives, was a little along those lines, to try and flush this tightness out.

    We;ve really had a lot of bits and pieces over the years of this thread!
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    CC82 said:
    900 marathons does indeed sound absolutely mental.  I mean, if you do one run per day, it will take the guts of 3 years to even run 900 times.

    According to Po10, I've ran a grand total of 60 official races (which includes Parkruns - 12 of them, I think).
    I've run 256 races (includes 42 parkruns - sue me!!) only 4 of these were marathons. How the bloody hell do you run more than 3 times that many marathons????
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    Stevie G said:

    The ultrasound one was quite awkward, where some doc hangs behind you almost spooning you, while digging a scanner into your ribs having glooped you up with some sort of mush.


    Good oh - sounds like'll I'll have some bloke spooning me whilst digging a scanner into my crotch then! 

    Probably something your average tory MP pays good money for.......
  • DachsDachs ✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    Stevie G said:
    Dachs, Reading seem to struggle to hold the same venue don't they? Had a course i can't remember, the posh school, and maybe somewhere else before Crowthorne? Now, just some random park? Lap job?

    I ask this as i've done about 1 event in 3 years, and can't pretend i fancy a string of em this time either...

    hang on....900 marathons? And official ones? Are there even 50 a year? So 18 years of one every week? Madness.

    It's not some random park, SG, it is a park which is very well suited to a XC race.  More like a common.  It'll give the TVXCers a taste of proper XC (where you do generally run laps in parks) before they start demolishing the post-race buffet ;)

    Re 900 marathons, yes there are plenty, particularly if you go abroad which he does with great regularity.  There are also at least a couple of events where you can do 4 in 4 days.  But yeah, he's been doing it for a long time.  He's number 2 on the 100 Marathon Club list.  We've got at least four others in the club who have over 100, and another who's on 99.

    I doubt if I'll reach double figures.


  • Dachs said:
     He's number 2 on the 100 Marathon Club list.  We've got at least four others in the club who have over 100, and another who's on 99.

    I doubt if I'll reach double figures.


    #4 actually

    There are records for Slowest Marathon and wine drinking marathons. Reckon I could make double figures if I have not done so already.

  • DachsDachs ✭✭✭

    Who are we talking about?  I checked their website and my clubmate is listed as having the second highest total.

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭

    I know we've had this debate before, but a 32min 10k versus 900 marathons has only 1 winner for me.

    And it aint the former, even though we're fairly time fascist on this page.


    Just imagining running 900 slow as you like training runs of that length sounds an epic undertaking to me! You'd have to have some core strength so it didn't ruck you up. Well, for at least as much time as the next one was due, which would be soon!

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    Dachs said:
    Stevie G said:
    Dachs, Reading seem to struggle to hold the same venue don't they? Had a course i can't remember, the posh school, and maybe somewhere else before Crowthorne? Now, just some random park? Lap job?

    I ask this as i've done about 1 event in 3 years, and can't pretend i fancy a string of em this time either...

    hang on....900 marathons? And official ones? Are there even 50 a year? So 18 years of one every week? Madness.

    It's not some random park, SG, it is a park which is very well suited to a XC race.  More like a common.  It'll give the TVXCers a taste of proper XC (where you do generally run laps in parks) before they start demolishing the post-race buffet ;)

    Re 900 marathons, yes there are plenty, particularly if you go abroad which he does with great regularity.  There are also at least a couple of events where you can do 4 in 4 days.  But yeah, he's been doing it for a long time.  He's number 2 on the 100 Marathon Club list.  We've got at least four others in the club who have over 100, and another who's on 99.

    I doubt if I'll reach double figures.



    Laps in parks. Doesn't sound thrilling. Sounds more the domain of you skinny running snakes at the front.

    Us plodders want a bit more scenery and ting while we're doddling round.

    Probably.

    (mutes the group chat, hoping he can avoid any talk of future TVXC turnups)


  • Dachs said:

    Who are we talking about?  I checked their website and my clubmate is listed as having the second highest total.

    Crossed lines. I assumed you meant 800 wanker was #2, he is #4.
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    SG - your two posts are quite contradictory :-)

    As it happens, personally I'd (if I could go back in time!) take a sub 32 min 10k over X 100 marathons, but it is all down to perspective and the viewpoint of the observer. 
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    Strava-ites - thoughts on the new dashboard layout? I don't like it - prefer a basic summary list!
  • In the vein of FKTs vs WRs, recently Adam Holland (another multi-marathoner) wasn't given the WR for the fastest 10 maras in 10 days (a low 2:40s average) due to some dispute by Guinness, so has to settle for a FKT. Real shame.

    Scott - hope all is well with the Mrs and the little boy!

    CC, good to see you out with some good miles in post-mara and back twinge. Reg, great work on the Jagers, oh and the awards!
    SG, strong tempo again - you should really make the most of this fitness!

    Some easy runs and a long run to finish last week just over 40miles, not too shabby post-race.
    Track session this evening was 2 x 800m (300m), 3 x 600m (200m), 2 x 400m (100m) - it was supposed to be 4 x 400m, but I canned the last two, on account of losing ground on the others and starting to feel a little creaky. No point in digging a ditch and overdoing it!
    Just to confuse Reg even further with how my training times fit in with race times - reps came out as 2:41/2:41/2:01/2:00/2:00/1:21/1:19. So essentially 1:20 lapping throughout the whole 4.2km session. 
    Little wonder I canned it, as that's 16:40 5km pace right there - I think even a blind man could see that doesn't fit in with my race times :D
    Dare I say it, I'm starting to feel stronger, and it just goes to show with that sort of consistency!
  • PeteMPeteM ✭✭✭
    PMJ you can have a field day analysing where some of these CP10 start liners finished! Go easy on our guy in green, he's a few weeks off v70☺
  • DeanR7DeanR7 ✭✭✭


    Or possibly..'Oh look at me!! look at me! 'I'm not actually that good at running and not got enough moral fibre to train harder to get faster..so I'll peel off and do something that I can be the bestest at .

    Isn't that the motto of most triathletes.... ;)
  • DeanR7DeanR7 ✭✭✭
    The Bus said:
    Each to their own though - which is actually harder, or more impressive: a sub 32 minute 10k or 800 marathons? . 



    More impressive? ....easily the sub 32.   What's more impressive playing in 1 champions league final or 800 Sunday league games.  Quality always over quantity.  Anyone can run lots slowly, not everyone can run a few fast.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    Dean while the sentiment works the analogy doesnt.

    Marathons are a slog of a distance whatever the pace. A 10k isn't.
    And why is a sub32 champions league when elites range from 26-30 ish?
    But of course a sub 32 or fast race is more impressive athletic wise.
    But almost1000 marathons is impressive on a commitment level. Its not a parkrun that can be dribbled round every week with zero physical effort.

    Bus where's the contradiction?
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    Good paces matt. 

    Not finishing shows the peril of being influenced by others a bit though. Race in races not in training. Promising generally though
    Interesting to do all distances at same pace. Was that the goal? Otherwise youd expect 400s to be quicker unless you were lashing yourself on the 800s.
    Always good when the distance goes down isnt it.
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    First post you're a time fascist, second you are a plodder :-)

    Dean, maybe but depends on your audience. Most on this thread are predisposed to the quality as that is what drives them. I don't agree that most people can run 800 marathons , no matter how slowly!
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    :) that was just balance to the hyping mass marathons up. We're "generally" time fascists but that sort of completion should be aside from that.

    I still think 14 is plenty for a long run. I couldn't take a 26.2 every week...for 18 years
  • CC82CC82 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2017
    I don't think the two are really comparable although I'd take a sub 32 over the marathons any day.  Saying that - let's try and compare them ;)  How many miles are run over the years to achieve a sub 32 10k vs. how many total miles are run in completing 900 marathons?  A lot.  Obviously.

    In a year, a sub 32 10k runner is probably clearing what 4000 miles?  An 80 mile a week runner would get past 4000.  Obviously, everyone is different, but I'd have thought runners in the sub 32 region would be generally running pretty big weeks.  I bet your marathoner that runs a marathon every week isn't running 80 mile weeks.  40 mile weeks or maybe at a push 50s?

    What's the bigger commitment?
  • Sub 32 is well better! ;) Seriously though - all these hundreds of marathons stuff - whats the point? It's just ego polishing.

    Nice photo Pete - presume Torry won and Cornish? from HW up there too by the looks.

    5 x 1200 last night, no slope..wo-hoo! 3.49,3.48,3.49,3.50,3.43. Grass not too bad, bit slippy in places. Felt good this morning on the long commute. Even though it's Wednesday - usually wandering idiot pedestrian day

Sign In or Register to comment.