Moraghan Training - Stevie G

1164816491651165316541916

Comments

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭

    Varied stuff Pete. Glad you're getting to do your own stuff, rather than being dictated to!


    You almost suckered me into my oft repeated MP/Threshold/continuous threshold yabber there for a second :)

    But put shortly, MP is a terminology relating to 15secs slower than HMP, or 20secs slower than 10mile race pace.

    So say today was my top end, zones would be

    MP 6.10-6.15
    HMP 5.55-6.00
    10mile 5.50-5.55

    This stands up decently against the 10miles and HM I've put in these last 2 years.

    Wokey 2018 - 5.54

    10milers 59.30 - 5.57 - but hot and humid days

    Wokey 2020 - 6.05 - but almighty winds, and without any blaggery would have been at least 6.00 on a normal day.


    So obvs those zones are subject to route and conditions, as per the races, but they give a decent framework to work off.

    I'd see myself putting a number of these 6milers in at that MP zone above, developing to ending "hard", and then putting HMP sections, or 10mile pace sections in.

    It can get tasty, but that's when you remember that the real training is stuff that pushes you, not the stuff we like doing, which I guess we're all guilty of a lot of the time!!




  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    Pete - it takes the pressure of me knowing Jools is even madder for hills than me :smile:

    That 10k looks pretty good from here as a solo run, even if you normally effectively run it solo it's a different kettle of fish when it genuinely is. Mind you, you really needed to have done a fast parkrun the day before to get the best out of it :smiley:  Not sure how hill reps translate really, as I never really measure them other than the odd segment, but if she's beating you she is doing well! Talking of which, I got the old "Uh oh" email from Strava a couple of days back for one of my favourite local KOMs  - 192ft  climb over 0.2M of grass at a fairly constant 16%.  I held for years then had to bust a gut a couple of summers back to re-take in 2:01. This guy at the weekend did it in 2:00 dead! I gave him kudos and told him I'd be back to go 2 secs quicker, but seriously doubt I could :smile:

    Nice tempo SG at MP/T/CT :wink:
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    At least the guy who saw your seg saw it through.
    I've attempted a few soft looking extreme hill reps and quickly realised they aren't soft and maxed my hr right out ☺😄
  • TRTR ✭✭✭
    edited April 2020
    Jools - the lockdown might stop you burning too many matches during a training build up, youd need to keep it like that when racing comes back,  so you can nail a mara.

    Pete - that is a tasty 10k solo. I wouldnt even be able to do more than around 4 or 5m of hmp in training, so that is probably a slower pace than hmp for you at the mo?

    SG - you could do a few races as sessions to build back up, rather than wait until youve done some sessions in readiness. Muddy would approve.

    11m here today after work.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2020

    TR, I think realistically there's loads of time to get the sessions in! We might have most of this year to do so!

    But the first race or 2 could certainly be some sort of "loosener".

    When I compare the difference between Wokey 2018 and 2020, yes the wind was a factor this year, and things can change in 2 years, but a key difference was probably 2018 came off the back of loads of xc races, whereas 2020 came off a single xc about 6 weeks before, and no other races 4months before that. That lack of race intensity practice makes a fair difference.

    Nice 11 - business as usual for you with the double digits anyway!


    Pete, you're certainly unusual compared to many runners. Most runners need both a light day before a race as well as needing like paced people round them to spur on a top performance. There will always be outliers though, who could forget Sikora of Marlow (whose dad has been on the news recently, some world famous cancer specialist no less), who did something like a 2.45 marathon and a 30min undulating 5mile race...on the same damn day! And then a 18 or so 5k on the Tuesday.

    That's a mix I've never seen anyone else do close to. Even better than Sam Amend's marathons on consecutive weekends years back!

  • PeteMPeteM ✭✭✭
    edited April 2020
    TR the difference between us is you are too modest to mention is you are very good at marathons and high quality at HM too. 10k or less is my distance; my times are relatively poor at HM and at marathons were so bad I gave them up nearly 10 years ago. As such I can knock out what is my HM pace (about 6'40 based on the recent Wokey) quite easily for 5 miles or so (would only need a 33'20 5 miler or 41'24 10k). With you being more like 1'20 HM, so 6'06 pace, you would need about a 30'30 5 miler to match your HM pace; much harder.

    SG; you're right I don't usually need company to run my best pace; maybe company is a negative and that's why I'm getting beaten by my daughter on the hill sprints ;)
  • TRTR ✭✭✭
    SG - fair point, some intensity is required to get in shape, but im happy to use a few low key races to get some.

    Pete - ha ha. Well i certainly never prepare for shorter races. I take your point, but you would defo run a lot quicker than today in a race environment, so it was a worthwhile confidence booster.
  • JooliganJooligan ✭✭✭
    Sounds like a cracking 10K to me Pete & I'd say your daughter's hill rep crown would be safe from me. 120m@5/6% is not my thing at all - far too short.
    Very tasty tempo too SG
    I did the same 11M run as yesterday but in reverse to have a crack at a couple of new segments. As the 1st was a twisty undulating K which arrives just 3.6M in, I threw 6x100m strides in to loosen up starting just over a mile beforehand to give me plenty of recovery. I went into it fresh & hard but not so much I blew up before the segment was done 3:36 was enough to get the CR. A mile recovery brought me to the 2nd: a flat 300m which I hit hard & managed 2nd - just 2s off the CR! From then it was a comfortable trot home - though the final 1.7M climb home was tough.
    No more segment chasing this week :p 
  • RicFRicF ✭✭✭
    Ok then, good to see so many of us are still able to function right now.

    And good luck and a speedy recovery to all those 'currently crocked'.

    Since training numbers appears to be the most acceptable fare on the table, I thought I'd add a few of my own.

    Here's the past ten days from my side of things.

    2019          Activity                             
    April  5           0                               
    April  6           0
    April  7     Run 15 miles
    April  8           0
    April  9     Run 4 miles
    April 10          0
    April 11    Run 4 miles
    April 12          0
    April 13    Run 15 miles
    April 14          0



    2020         Activity                             
    April  5     Cycle 65 miles                            
    April  6     Run 20 miles
    April  7     Cycle 35 miles
    April  8     Cycle 76 miles
    April  9     Run  7 miles
    April 10    Cycle 72 miles
    April 11    Cycle 67 miles
    April 12    Run 15 miles
    April 13    Cycle 24 miles
    April 14    Cycle 77 miles

    Today? A run of some sort.


    🙂

  • JooliganJooligan ✭✭✭
    Building a decent endurance base there Ric.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2020
    Keep it going chaps.

    10 for me..obvs. 7.04 job.
    At about 4miles, i took in the start of what used to be the Wooburn park 10k that started with a steep 1k up.

    Will be interested what the elevation is when i check later. Has to be a good 150 feet over the half a mile that climbs as a guess.

    Trying to think of other races that start with hills...obviously outside of that mile hill race!
    Wycombe half (and 10k) had a half mile then a whopping hill.

    Chichester 10k old course started with a half km climb.


    Can't think of too many other very early in climbs.
    Marlow half and 7 at least had the best bit of a mile first i think.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2020

    Ok, on checking, the climb is exactly 200feet over 0.4mile. No wonder that felt a tasty start to a 10k back in the day, but gave an incredible finish!

    Never noticed the % grade element to hills on strava before.

    12.9% the steepest on this route. Not sure how that links in with giving a 1 in 2, 1in 3 etc type steep rating on a hill.

    Obviously had to compare it to the Murder Mile.

    The steepest % grade there is exactly double, at 24.8%


    Looking at the grid below, it's not as obvious as I originally thought, that you run the first half, and stagger the second.

    There's still a 167 feet climb in that first 0.2miles!

    The "smart" time to gun it (relatively speaking), is between 0.2m and 0.4m which rises a mere 70 feet :)

    Then another 70 feet from 0.4m to 0.5m

    but then all bets are really off, as it's 85, 100, 110, 90 the next 0.1m sections, before around 10 feet for the last 0.1m where you suddenly turn back into a runner!



  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    SG - you are talking hils :smiley:

    How about this one then? Grisedale Grind 1500ft in under a mile with 47% at its steepest!





  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭

    That's no bones about it a walk though aint it. Or probably more a crawl.

    We're all proper runners on here :D


  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭

    What does the percentage actually mean? Obvs 100% would be straight line up, but is there some calculation versus feet gained in feet run, like the 1/2 1/4 type calcs?

    Or is it merely some protractor esque angle?

  • PeteMPeteM ✭✭✭
    Its just that SG; 47% is 47 metres gained vertically per 100 metres run so equivalent to almost 1 in 2 (which would be 50%). Your murder mile at just under 25% is about 1 in 4. Even a 1 in 20 (5%) is a steep hill to run up; especially for any material distance. Cycling wise if you are going up anything like 20% for more than a few metres you really know it and would be hanging on and cycling at about 3 or 4 mph! Road signs used to be 1 in whatever but now all in percentages;much easier I think.

    BTW just being pedantic 24.8% is not quite double your 12.9%; would need 25.8% ;)
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    PeteM said:u
    Its just that SG; 47% is 47 metres gained vertically per 100 metres run so equivalent to almost 1 in 2 (which would be 50%). Your murder mile at just under 25% is about 1 in 4. Even a 1 in 20 (5%) is a steep hill to run up; especially for any material distance. Cycling wise if you are going up anything like 20% for more than a few metres you really know it and would be hanging on and cycling at about 3 or 4 mph! Road signs used to be 1 in whatever but now all in percentages;much easier I think.

    BTW just being pedantic 24.8% is not quite double your 12.9%; would need 25.8% ;)
    Whoops. Well corrected.

    Originally i had written "almost double" then quickly..and wrongly panicked it was exactly double 😄😄
  • TRTR ✭✭✭
    Good endurance building Ric

    Always makes me smile when SG refers to Chichester as having hills or slopes......IoW 1/2 and Harting trail 10 both start on a  hill and involve a longish stretch of going uphill from step 1.

    11m here today.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    That's the old Chichester. I believe the current one is flat now?

    Half a km up and a hill around 6-7km?
    Not "that" hilly when compared to the half marathons and Mt 10ks i first Started racing. But surprisingly hilly for a fast race.
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    Stevie G said:

    That's no bones about it a walk though aint it. Or probably more a crawl.

    We're all proper runners on here :D


    Didn't you say you had to walk part of the MM though SG? :smiley:

    Anyway, I ran all of the GG - just VERY slowly at times!
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2020

    Below a certain pace I'm not sure it even counts as a run. That's generally when a walk moves you along quicker!

    I can't imagine a 48% incline gets above a gentle wander :o


  • TRTR ✭✭✭
    edited April 2020
    SG - ha ha, the course you are talking about was flat in my memory bank. But it must have gone a bit more uphill than the short incline at Lavant as there was a nice long run down a slight slope to the finish.
  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    It's a transition SG - bit like on a treadmill when you can't decide whether to walk or jog :smiley:  Personally I reckon anything under 15 minute mile pace counts as "running" in that terrain but you'd definitely be running at the same pace some people are walking!
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭

    The whole last km was downhill! So there was deffo some ups in there :D

    I remember blocking some angry little ginger bloke in some team with the name Crusaders? Felt a bit guilty after though :(

    The same guy was at Gosport once for the 5k when they had a dreadful route that had half a km over bobbly stones. He stayed sooo close to some lanky older blokes heels and clipped him a couple of times. The guy showed remarkable restraint not to lash out :)

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2020
    The Bus said:
    It's a transition SG - bit like on a treadmill when you can't decide whether to walk or jog :smiley:  Personally I reckon anything under 15 minute mile pace counts as "running" in that terrain but you'd definitely be running at the same pace some people are walking!


    Most likely there won't be any races by August, so it might not be a bad thing to break my little 3 year sequence at Murder Mile. Last year lost a little of the magic, combined with the idiotic run getting lost in a nature park, plus "gone" legs attempt at a parkrun the next morning!

    Just hope we have some autumn stuff, or the end of year reviews will be dreadful.

    Not sure how many races others on here have done in 2020, but i'm on one, so I'd have to milk that into all of the categories :)

  • WoolWool ✭✭✭
    Locally, Yateley, Windsor HM both start with a hill. Swallowfield 10k has a flat opening km but is up quite steeply for the next 2 km. Even the old South Bucks 10k starts half way up the hill. It can make for quite a quick course if you climb early, descend late.

    Seeing some interesting route choices on Strava for time trials. They are certainly not flat! With that and checking out differences in moving time vs elapsed time on the app, I’m winding my way through lockdown nicely.

    I’ve received a couple of SG’s YouTube vids privately (!). I sent him back with the finish line vid from Abingdon 2019. TR finishing like a raging bull! 
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2020
    A couple of the local clubs do some sort of virtual relay where they do somewhere in the 3-4mile terrain.

    A local nutcase did his on a 400 foot downhill for 3.5miles or so at 5.34 including a 501 first mile with 250 foot descent 😄

    Wool i forgot the South Bucks 10k. Probably the only net downhill race I've done. I didn't think you had much up on the start but in effect had one up and two downs, hence being a good pb job.

    I won't though forget racing with Stevie Fell who ( as always) didn't have a watch, so was demanding splits and shouting stuff like " what are we gonna say on the internet later"😄

    Needless to say i found something deep to get ahead and away from the shouting!
  • JooliganJooligan ✭✭✭
    On the subject of hill races. This is the Mic Morris Torfaen 10K profile:

    The opposite of the Murder Mile & my 10K PB despite being in far from peak shape back in September 17 after spending the Summer working at festivals then teaching in China where it was 40+ degrees & 80% humidity the whole time so far from conducive to running.
    If we're allowed to race by August I'm fully intending to have a crack at the Murder Mile btw SG so be a shame if you break your streak this year.
    After 8 consecutive double digit days, a day biking hills & 14 double digit days prior to that with 26,600ft climbed I'm having a cutback week - I've dropped the elevation rather than the mileage.
    I figure I've earned a lighter week. 13.7M today but less than 300ft climbed. Unsurprisingly the pace was considerably quicker  

  • The BusThe Bus ✭✭✭
    Just the 13.7 midweek miles then Jools? Definitely much lighter :smiley:

    You could definitely do something big in the hills currently if only you were allowed too!

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    A 600feet downhill Jools! Not sure that's strictly a legal course 😄😄.

    That'd probs be more fun to do and temporarily shock people on strava by booting something mad fast out!!

    I won't rule the MM out. I just hope it's even an option. Probably on the more underground side and could evade the rules more than bigger stuff maybe.

    Useful run. Not tempted to nicely round it to 14?!
Sign In or Register to comment.