Chester Marathon

2»

Comments

  • Either way, Ian, you'll have your feet up in the bar by the time I'm finished!
  • CSMLFCCSMLFC ✭✭✭
    Weather looks perfect for Sunday if slightly cold in the morning! I've not done a lot the last 2 weeks but am looking forward to just getting going and getting some miles behind me. Aiming for straight 7 m/m miles and seeing what happens, have trained for that pace all summer and 3.09 is my PB so will happily take anything less than that.

    Also a heads up incase anyone hasn't ran Chester before the queues into the racecourse by car can be pretty big so if recommend parking in one of the many car parks in the city centre and then walking over. The Grosvenor multi storey is really handy and worth payingfor in my opinion!

    Cal - 3436 - targetting 4:15.
    Galdrags-3473- 4:25
    Mr M2  3693  Hoping for sub 4:10
    Ian-1714 hope for 3:15
    csmlfc- anything less than 3:09 
  • Ian5Ian5 ✭✭✭
    Hope everyone went well. 3:14:35 here so 25 secs inside my target and another 5 min PB.
  • MrM2MrM2 ✭✭✭
    Ian5 Excellent result; should never have questioned it!
    For myself...happy with 4:07:25. looked like I was on for nearer 4:05, but the last few km had other ideas! Will post a few more details later on. (Results service and data are best I've come across!)  Still a few more to report in...Hope there will be good news.
  • Good job MrM2 - target achieved!
    Ian, well done again.
    I had a brilliant race - first time I've ever managed to keep an even pace (I did slow a bit on that bastard hill near the end, but still kept it under 10). New PB is 4:10:42 which is better than I predicted (previous best was 4:18:21 in Manchester). I'm very happy.
  • Some excellent running there- v impressed with the PBS as that was a much tougher course than advertised? That last long hill meant that no one around me was running which wasn’t ideal.

    i came in at 4h19 which was about the best case scenario today. 5 mins slower than Manchester but i’ll take that!

    whats next?!
  • Ian5Ian5 ✭✭✭
    MrM2-At some stages I was questioning it myself.
    Sounds like everyone should be happy with their results so a good day all round.
    Smithy Lane was a beast of a hill to end with.
  • Good job, Gladrags - under the circumstances that's still a great time.
  • CSMLFCCSMLFC ✭✭✭
    Ran dead on 7mm miles and finished on 3.05 flat. 4 minute pb, probably could have gone a couple of minutes quicker but had a plan and stuck to it so really happy overall 
    Another great day in Chester faultless organisation and the family all enjoyed it too. Got to be one of the best marathons going.
    Well done all seems most achieved their target!
  • greta race and organisation.  gutted to see so much rubbish on course away from the water stations and several people just hurl bottles into the hedge.. :(

  • Seren - agree with the rubbish comment. people just didn't seem aware of the etiquette? Lots of first timers and no explicit instructions on where to drop stuff in the race booklet to blame?

    Like the analysis on the results page showing your position in the field at the 10, 20, 30 and 40k markers? Quite gratifying to know that I passed 300 people in between 10k and the end!

    How did everyone find running with the metric marathoners? They seemed to be mainly walking by the time I reached them which was a pain. not so much that they were in the way but just that it's demotivating to be surrounded by walkers? Did the speedier amongst you fare better?

  • Ian5Ian5 ✭✭✭
    Gladrags-I found I was being overtaken by them as I was amongst the fast metric runners,I like feeling strong at the end and didn't feel like I was going fast being overtaken.
  • Ian5 - ah so the opposite problem from me! I just didn't think that combining the 2 races worked v well? 
  • CSMLFCCSMLFC ✭✭✭
    I personally enjoy meeting up with them. Mixes it up a little
  • CSMLFCCSMLFC ✭✭✭
    edited October 2018
    Gladrags how do you see your position at the 10k split recordings. Can't see them anywhere!

    Edit disregard that seen it's on the downloadable results. Very satisfying!
  • Seren, I agree - I held on to my gel packets until I got to a marshall point. There's absolutely no need to throw rubbish in the countryside.
    Gladrags, I wasn't too far ahead of you so I encountered a lot of the slow metrics but I just did my best to encourage them as I went past. I rather enjoyed passing people, to be honest! I interacted with people a lot more during this race as usually I get tired and shut down towards the end of marathons, so I think it actually gave me a boost. I too gained quite a lot of places during the race - there is no doubt that this is the best I've ever paced a marathon. That sub-4 is just a little bit closer than it was last week.
  • Cal it sounds like you had an amazing run? Sub 4 next time?

    I managed to pace myself better than ever before too - only slowed by 2 minutes in the second half. Everything conspired against Chester being my sub 4 attempt but am taking heart from it and aiming to have a proper go at it in Manchester next year.

    Interesting the mixed feelings on the metric runners? It just seemed to me that as a pack the marathoners were running quite nicely until they joined - it then switched almost instantly to being a walkers' race and it was v hard to keep the average pace up. Maybe it just depended where you were in the marathon pack as to what impact it had? presumably for some people it was ideal as it provided a little boost of pacemaking just when needed?

  • Big_GBig_G ✭✭✭
    Sorry for barging in here everyone!

    Gladrags, I wasn't at Chester but I'm just popping in as I know Ian and Cal from another thread.  Chester is on my list :)  

    It's not the same as what you're saying but just adding another perspective into the mix too, as I did Malta marathon this year in Feb.  The marathon runners started off, and then (I think) 90-mins later the Half marathon started and the two routes joined with approximately 10-miles to go.  I joined a lot of fairly quickly Half runners, may of who overtook me, but after a mile I settled with a group of Half runners who were running at the same pace as me.  It drove me on and helped me to get a marathon PB - the fact I had people around me who were comparably fresh was definitely one of the contributing factors.  On the other hand, there's a local race to me (Dartmoor Vale) which is two laps for the marathon, and one for the Half, and the races start at the same time with the Half being a lot more popular in terms of entrants.  Basically, the Half runners turn left to go to the finish, and the marathon runners turn right and have to go around again - I've done it twice, and both times I'm suddenly found myself totally on my own which can be very disheartening.  Writing that makes me wonder why I've entered it again this year, but the start is 10-mins from my house, so it'd be rude not to do it ;)  

    Well done everyone on here - Chester is definitely on my list, but I can't do it next year, so maybe the year after.  We'll see :)  
  • I'd agree with Big G's sentiment. It's fine in a race like Manchester (or London, obviously) where there are plenty of spectators, but in Chester, while support is good where there is support, there are long, rural stretches where I find the company of other runners invaluable. This is the only marathon where I haven't slowed down in the later stages (aside from the hill..!) so I'd say the metrics were more motivating than not.
  • MrM2MrM2 ✭✭✭
    Before the thread dies, I'd want to agree with others about the organisation at Chester; spot on. From the on-line application, chip-backed numbers through the post, help-desk on the Saturday, baggage drop, toilets....you stand a good chance of arriving at the start line in a 'relaxed' condition. The start area was clearly marked with anticipated finish times, but it was left to runners to be in the appropriate places. It took me two minutes to cross the line (starting behind the 4hr pacers) but I did notice that some who finished after me had very few seconds difference between their chip and gun times.......
    A bit bunched for a mile or so, then it was possible to run your own race. Timing mats every 10k gave great data. Drink stations were exactly as stated, and excellently 'manned'. Marshals were at all the helpful places, and so it continued, right down to the clearly-marked finish-funnel where the metric and full marathon runners divided. Then, exactly as stated, medal, drink, goody bag, shirt, and on to baggage pick-up. Quite a queue for the massage, and decided not to wait. Result service and Photography all up and available promptly.
    The merging of metric and full marathons for the last few miles didn't bother me; there was plenty of space, and it was good to keep picking-off runners.
    Pleased with my 10k splits; almost holding it together through to the end, and improving my gender and o'all positions at every stage. Managed 5th place out of the 19 in the 70+ group, and 1655 out of 2821 o'all. 10k splits: 57:24, 57:31, 57:42 and 60:12. My age-grading came out at just over 72% so that was very gratifying.
    Needless to say, this marathon scores 10 out of 10 from my perspective. Happy.
  • That's brilliant, MrM2 - you were just a bit ahead of me. I didn't realise you were a V70. What with the champs on, there were some very strong vets - the lady who won the VW50 (my cat) did a sub-3!
  • MrM2MrM2 ✭✭✭
    Thanks Cal.
    Looked at your 10k splits...what can I say? Have rarely managed them as good as that!
    Yes. 75 next year, and I'd love to still be running. I know that there are some very strong athletes out there, and currently I'm only 25th on the Run Britain rankings. First in my category was a David Winch, with 3:35. Just amazing.    Recover well. Happy running.
  • First time I've run that well, honestly. I've always faded in the past, but Chester was only my 6th marathon so I'm still learning how to run them. By the way, nice purple kit!
Sign In or Register to comment.