I just felt like having a rant at the 'training advice' printed in 'Health and Fitness' magazine to a first-time marathon runner, competing in the FLM.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but the advice given by celeb fitness guru Nicki Waterman seemed really wrong.
She advised that by now, weekly mileage should be 50-75miles, broken down into five 10-12runs plus a longer 15mile run.
I feel like writing to the magazine and suggesting that runners log onto this fab site, and pay no attention to the advice given.
Any comments?
0 ·
Comments
I think that plan isn't the best in the world, but it would probably work, but a bit more strain on the body than I'd like.
If I wanted advice though, I would do a bit more research than writing to a non-running magazine. And by now, it'll probably be too late for him.
No point in writing in - they aren't gonna recommend another mag unless it's the same publisher, which I don't think it is.
Rach
Seriously though, that weekly mileage seems rather high. Who exactly is it aimed at, I wonder?
Looking forward to the day when feeding stations in marathons are one again laden with steak sarnies and nippy water instead of the orange emetic.
I think the reader might have had sounder advice by writing to Angling Weekly.
I am aiming for sub 3 hours and so far my biggest mileage has been 62 miles- perhaps the letter was from a P.Radcliffe?
Having been raised on lurid tins of peas, sherbert fountains, love hearts and sunset yellow food colouring and suffering no ill-effects whatsoever I can vouch for that.
hahahaha
fat sozzled Benz----but i finished a marathon-two fingers to you lot
To suggest that a beginner should be doing 50+ miles now is ludicrous, unless that "beginner" has been running for several years and this is their first marathon.
I would love to be able to run 2:45 on 60 mpw. Don't have the confidence to let go of high mileage yet.
Did London last year in just under 3:02 so 2:59:59 should be do-able.I did win Blackpool the year before last but was disgusted with my time and desperate for a cup of tea, so didn't come accross as very ecstatic about it.
I have come to the conclusion that I am only going to do one a year- now I have discovered triathlons, prefer half marathons really.
Probably not the best training for me...
I will put a slightly positive stance on this as it has given a slightly sore hamstring time to heal. I am feeling slightly better tonight so the next job will be to build up my strength again. I shouldn't have lost much if any fitness in a few days.
Then on Radio 5 this afternoon they were interviewing a young lad who had neck cancer at the age of 11. They cured him with chemo and told him he had a 94% chance of escaping a recurrence. He didn't, and went through complete hell as it spread to his back. He survived again and is now OK it seems. It brought my own temporary problems truly into perspective, he seemed such a brave lad for a teenager.
Just when am I supposed to fit that in!!
I'm planning on running 8:15 - 8:30 miles during the mara; assuming I run 8:00 miles in training, thats somewhere between 6hrs 40mins - 10hrs running a week.
Now I tend to be doing quite a bit of cross training at the mo, as opposed to straight running (because I've been using the gym), so I'm probably getting up to 7hrs a week training. But theres no way I could fit in any more than 8hrs, any more than that and I think the results would be worse!
Smythe