This is a question which is asked on Marathon Talk. If you were given 6 months and everything was taken care of for you ie no working, shopping, cooking, travelling etc and you had all that time just to devote to training/recovering etc how fast do you think you could run a single mile at the end of the 6 month period.
The fastest they had on there is in the region of 3.53!
Comments
I'd be much more interested to know how quickly I could run a marathon given that timeframe and no commitments.
What does that even mean?!
I suppose it depends how much pain I was willing to endure trying to improve my lactic whadjummacallits, but given that McMillan reckons my marathon time is equivalent (ha!) to 4:29, I'm going to pluck a figure out of the donkey and say 4:21.
(My one attempt at the distance was in a relay race in Battersea Park, 4:52, but the halfway turn was worth at least 2.5 seconds I reckon.)
Our club had a mile race recently and I did it in 6:20.
I'm about 21:30 for 5k.
Back when I was around 30, I did a 6:20 mile on a treadmill. That was a real effort - I was completely winded. At the time I was doing a lot of interval work and was pretty fit. At 47, and outdoors, I reckon around 7 something. I'm not fast.
I could run 800m in 2:10 about five years ago. Like to think I could do under 5mins if I trained specifically for it over a period of time.
I've done a single 1 mile race, managed it in 5:46. Hoping to have another go sometime but there don't seem to be many 1 mile races around.
I reckon a 10% improvement over 6 months is probably realistic, so I reckon I could get pretty close to 5 minutes. If this hypothetical 6 months includes professional coaching, nutritional, physio, etc then under 5 minutes should be doable.