Moraghan Training - Stevie G

1148714881490149214931916

Comments

  • RicFRicF ✭✭✭
    Stevie G said:
    Are you saying us lot saying "100 is a lot" is being "made to seem" unnecessary Ric?
    You crack on if you think differently old son  :D
    Nothing to do with thread sentiments SG. It's the way the running trend moved away from mega mileage to something a little more manageable.

    That happened years ago. Sure it produced great runners, but equally it destroyed a lot. There's other ways of doing things. Discovering which one's work best is a work in progress, always.

    The echo chamber is a universal aspect of internet forums. Doesn't matter which.

    🙂

  • RicFRicF ✭✭✭
    Have to admit, I never managed to build on knackeredness. I simply became more knackered until I broke.

    Must be a special injury off switch for some runners. I mean, Ron Hill had an injury but still went and won a marathon as if nothing was amiss, and simply remarked the next day that the injury wasn't any better.

    🙂

  • People tend to break when they are caught in the vicious circle of train hard - run well - train harder - run better - train hard - run brilliantly - train harder....break down.

    Its hard to back off sometimes.

  • Free 10k entry for parkrunners into the 2019 Vitality London 10,000  Bank Holiday Monday 27 May

    https://app.realbuzzregistrations.com/events/lmel/2019-vl10k-parkrun-free-entry/login/


  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    DeanR7 said:
    Stevie G said:
    You'll develop week by week, that was always the beauty of the Moraghan sessions, but the only fear is obviously you've had all that time not building to the start sessions.

    What I didn't quite understand with the threshold plan I did pre GSR, was that the toughest sessions were actually early doors, and then you were doing what were clearly easier!
    For instance 3x2mile, 15-10-5min and the absolute beast 20-15-10-5.

    Then for weeks there was all this 4x1mile stuff and then a few kms and 200s.

    I'd have thought a better approach was stacking the hardest stuff to reach a crescendo near the end, and also don't think that broken threshold stuff is as effective as the conseuctive stuff, as after all, you don't get a little recovery in a race. If you're doing reps like that I'd prefer it to be a higher pace.
    .

    the idea of harder stuff earlier is the resistance/fatigue is built up over a 10wk plan.  so even if the sessions appear easier on paper they should be harder to achieve as you are more fatigued as you have been flogging yourself for weeks.   Doesnt mean you go all out first session but there doesnt need to be a slow burn up to goal pace.
    for example my reps dont get faster in my plans when aiming for a champs.  im often hitting the same pace or just under.  its because my body is knackered from the previous 6 weeks, which provides the extra resistance, so hitting same pace is actually me getting faster in theory.  once i get a taper or a cut back week i recover just in time for finals.  then the benefits hopefully show

    That's a good reading on it.
    Although at your paces I wouldn't expect you to get faster from middle to end, only from the "loosener" early weeks.

    The Johnas/Daniels plan did feel "right" in that I only really missed 1 pace in the whole 2 months, that was some insane paced 800m needed in the middle of a session. I think it was 2.28 needed, and I probably only put in about 2.34-6. Windy didn't help, but for me, a 2.28 is asking a lot, unless it's off a massive recovery, or completely fresh. As an effort, I'd "imagine" i could do a 2.20 or maybe slightly faster as an actual race.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    Free 10k entry for parkrunners into the 2019 Vitality London 10,000  Bank Holiday Monday 27 May

    https://app.realbuzzregistrations.com/events/lmel/2019-vl10k-parkrun-free-entry/login/



    Tried this, as it's a fairly costly race, but after entering details, it says i "can't enter"

    What stiuplations are there round it?
    Just off from work now, so will check later if you don't beat me to it.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    RicF said:
    Have to admit, I never managed to build on knackeredness. I simply became more knackered until I broke.

    Must be a special injury off switch for some runners. I mean, Ron Hill had an injury but still went and won a marathon as if nothing was amiss, and simply remarked the next day that the injury wasn't any better.

    People tend to break when they are caught in the vicious circle of train hard - run well - train harder - run better - train hard - run brilliantly - train harder....break down.

    Its hard to back off sometimes.

    When I do some of the Datchet sessions, I come away thinking, "too many" of these sort of sessions would quickly ruin someone, as especially the shorter stuff tends to get a little bit out of control.

    People say how training in a group is a great benefit, and I get that in a lot of ways, but not out of control stuff - the irregular up and down paced stuff.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    Reg Wand said:
    StevieW, it's 50-90% of the interval time, actually I think that looks a fairly easy session, 38 minutes at tempo seems a lot worse to me.

    SG, I find the split runs harder, once I get in the groove I can keep it going but I am finding the second one hard. The 10k plan has the LT runs split into three sections. These were originally pioneered by Jack Daniels, apparently, I am looking at the book as I write this. There are ones similar to your suggestions in the 5k plans, for example 4 x 6 minutes but I guess this is a half marathon plan so the durations are longer to simulate what will be required on race day.
    If it's the Daniels stuff, you'll be aiming for a faster pace on the split runs than the consecutive ones though? Off my vdot it suggested around 5.54 for the split and something like 6.02 and 6.06 for 30 and then 40mins consecutives.

    Try doing 30mins in a go at the pace you're trying to do 18 and 12 at in two sections. That has to be harder surely.
  • Assuming you mean continuous rather than consecutive, logically I would agree, split should be easier and it may be true for me. It just doesn't feel that way, I felt like I could carry on for another 12 minutes after the 18 but who knows.

    The pace I am achieving indicates I am not in great shape at the moment. My HR was pretty much in the right place for LT effort though.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2018
    Im thinking laps still..hence consecutive laps but yes continuous is the right word!

    Good day at work with a chrimbo dinner and hour quiz. Gave me one of those occasional sweeps of "i need to socialise more".
    Am sure itll pass :D
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭


    Just realised Gosport mile/5k double is the same day as Endure 24, arse!

    I suppose the latter does have a lot more capability to be an all time great memory with the team, it's just the Gosport events, especially as a double are such a nice little combo. Will have to get to one or two of the 5 standalone 5ks.

  • Endure is a good laugh. I'd speculate it's more worthwhile than the Gosport adventure.
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    There was talk from one of the "keener" team members in trying to replicate a bit of the experience by monstering out some late night laps in some pitch black park :D
  • DeanR7DeanR7 ✭✭✭
    Good read ric. I think gives me food for thought why my 5 & 10k are not as strong as they should be.  I guess I spend so much of my yr smashing middle distance speed reps that I'm lacking in other needed areas plus inefficiency.
    i have some plans to get my 5&10k more aligned with what I think I can run in 2019. 
  • PeteMPeteM ✭✭✭
    Perhaps the issue Dean is you can't be everything as a runner all at the same time! You would never get top 800 and 1500 men just trying to throw in a competitive top level 10k because the training is so different. To me that's what makes Mo so special as he can compete at pretty much the top level from 1m to 26.2m. I'm sure, with your proven endurance allied to phenomenal middle distance speed, you could get to 31'xx 10k if that was your primary focus for 6 months, but would you want that at the expense of a few seconds over an 800?

    I'm reading all these training programmes and schedules from SG, Reg etc. and can't help thinking is it all over precision and should we not all just try and emulate Simon? His methods of run lots, race lots, put the club sessions in and let the rest take care of itself whilst enjoying a pint seem to deliver excellent results☺. 

    Just a pr for me this weekend and 18'50 at Woking no better than mediocre, but suppose its not the time of year for quick runs. Feels weird to suddnenly have these weekends with no Sunday race and its not good for keeping the alcohol consumption down! 
  • Interesting conversations regarding training, as per usual, making good reading over the days.

    Pete, I do agree with you partly - I think with short track reps you definitely need to be hitting target times and paces, however when it gets longer it's a case of seeing what turns out. That's one thing I like about doing almost all of my sessions (previously, and again when I reintroduce them) on the roads, they're almost always different and down to the route as well - good for emulating races.


    So, target 5k this morning. Was a bit worried Thurs and Fri when looking at the weather fronts forecast to come in - mid 20mph winds, 30-40mph gusts, and torrential rain.
    Got up early enough to eat etc., and the weather didn't seem as bad as forecast, which I was hoping for. Felt a bit sniffly the past few days, and so took a decongestant this morning, and had porridge and coffee - I was hoping that I'd have enough time between taking the decongestant and running, as this combination had previously delivered my only DNF due to stomach cramps.
    Warm up was running from the GFs parents house into town, just over 3mi - the HR was up for easy effort, despite the route in being sheltered, and so I put down to the caffeine/decongestant. Lo and behold after half a mile or so, I felt cramp-like sensations, but they were mild. I get to the venue, and have another 30 mins until the race, and thankfully they subside.
    The course is rather flat, but features 7 or 8 corners 90° or tighter, as well as a few cycling of those irritating pavement fences to encourage responsible cycling - which breaks up the rhythm.
    Set off a bit too fast with a track start, not knowing where I'd sit in the pack, but the first km comes through in 3:52 as we are heading along a path around the town's college, feeling smooth and in control. In the second km is the only 'climb', a short gradual hill, at which I notice my pace dropping over the top and so make sure to put my foot down again, and had a 3:53. The next km sees us arrive in the Meadows, a park in the centre of town with paths alongside the canal and river, that has the most tight corners, including a U-turn. This breaks up the pace, with the split coming through as 3:59, but I take the opportunity to take a few scalps. We then head back onto the path around the college but in the reverse direction, so slightly downhill, and I'm making sure I listen to the feet behind and don't drop off. I'm starting to flag as the going gets tough, and have a 3:56. We  carry along the path and return to the track, which is the final 500m, and so that's the opportunity to get a late surge in. Final km comes through in 3:46, and I'm cooked as I cross the line.

    19:07 called out as I cross the line, but I'm not sure of my placing, and I'm very happy as I've only done easy miles and a weekly steady run since getting back to it after the GSR. In my mind I had a sub-20 aim, but also wanted to push to see what I could get, based on early miles in the Mob Match and GSR.

    Jog the 3 or so miles back, and that's when the weather really comes in - horrifically heavy rain and strong winds. So glad it was pretty tame during the race!

    It's now a case of continuing what I've been doing for the last 8 or so weeks into the new year, and then start working out some kind of training plan! Sub-19 should be for the taking for next month's edition of the race.
  • RicFRicF ✭✭✭
    Thanks to anyone for appreciating the pages from Watts, Wilson and Horwill circa 1972.

    Good race there Matt. Nice to see someone not getting bogged down in micro details as regards training. 

    Yes Pete, the process is rather less complicated than some would believe. 

    🙂

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    Yeah matt don't worry about details, just go out and run  :dizzy:

    Rare social meet up with the datchet gang last night combined with a 15miler early doors today.

    Surprisingly decent fare.
  • alehousealehouse ✭✭✭
    edited December 2018
    Thanks for the book pages, Ric! I like what Wilson writes on page 11: tried to load a photo of it, and failed. 

    I know Watts and Wilson had some disagreements, with Watts writing elsewhere that you should never sacrifice a running session for weights or circuits so even within the higher coaching ranks there were differences of opinion on what works best. 

    I am very much in the "keep it simple camp": run plenty of miles, most of them slow, some of them quicker, lots of them hilly, most of them off-road where possible with progressive consistent consistency.
    Progress is rarely a straight line. There are always bumps in the road, but you can make the choice to keep looking ahead.
  • Sounds very much like my training plan Aley - except for the plenty of miles and some of them quicker bits :smiley:

    Good work Matt. Sounds like some very faffy bits in the course then?

    Solid 15 SG - looks a lot like HM training...

    Hilly, muddy 13 for me today. All felt OK, but rathered knackered now!  Interestingly, despite this year having my lowest ever number of races, and multiple issues with niggles, I've still covered a relatively large number of (slow!) miles and on course to finish on my 3rd or 4th highest mileage year, with my highest ever ascent total.
  • Actually, just checking back, I actually did less races last year (if you include parkruns!). Shows how your memory plays tricks on you!
  • RicFRicF ✭✭✭
    Hi Alehouse,

    Here's that page.



     SG,  what was that emoticon meant to signify? 

    🙂

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    That's the "Ric's off on one again one"
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭

    :D

    Or it was attempting to do a smiley on the phone. Goodness knows that that one is..it's not even In the options list!

  • Dizzy. Apparently...



  • Bus, here's the course - anti-clockwise lap of the track, tricky corners out, on the college path and follow into the Meadows, hang a left onto the canal path, sharp right diagonal through the park, sharp left up the river path before the U-turn, back down the river, hang a right, hang a left back onto the college path, tricky corners back into the track  :D 

    I think the faff makes up for the flatness, to make it a run-of-the-mill 5k course I reckon!

    SG, I didn't want my comment to seem like I'm criticising your, or others, approach. If you enjoy planning splits, and thrive on hitting them, and that's what works for you, then that's what you should do :)


    12mi long run today, the leg that was the problem previously is feeling a little tight after yesterday, but no massive problem throughout and got better during the run. What is a pain is that it puts me on 39.9 for the week!
  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2018


    Certainly no offence taken from you Matt, you're the thread nice guy :)
    Not sure I enjoy much about the tempos, bar the effect afterwards, I'll always enjoy reps more as you get to stop quite often :)

    What shouldn't be missed though, is page 1 of this thread isn't where it started for me, i'd been going years and years before that, so i'd tried the any old iron approach... not to mention more random stuff and changes in style over the past few years.

    Go easy on the leg as you're turning over decently that aside.


  • Nice work on the 5k Matt. Some good long runs going on too.

    My 10 -12 ended up being the prescribed 11 miles. Right calf was pretty sore from the LT effort on Friday. I realised that I had neglected to put my orthotic in, possibly a contributory factor. Nothing special about today's effort, HR was a bit high but breathing felt good for the first time in a long while. 37.8 miles for the week against 34 in the plan. I am hoping to overshoot most weeks as I'd rather it this way than attempting a higher mileage plan and constantly fallng short, or worse getting injured doing too much.

    On Pete's point on 'over precision,' It's not as such in my case. I've just simply picked an off-the-shelf plan. I don't see it as the right answer, just a sensible plan to help me improve. Following a plan will allow me to stick within a sensible programme, without having to do too much thinking. I'll do a little thinking of my own as I follow it but mainly with a view to remaining uninjured. I actually really like having a session given to me, albeit from a book and having to try and hit the targets.

  • Stevie  GStevie G ✭✭✭✭

    It's nice to have a plan, but it's also nice to be able to go and do a random race just because you fancy it.  Very easy to forget it's about enjoyment, and relays/team turnouts add to that massively.

    Endure 24 came up last night at the Dashers do, which should be a great event. Slightly nervous that they think 6min miling on a 5mile offroad route, is a reasonable request!

Sign In or Register to comment.