Do we prefer simplicity or detail of previous schedules? I think I like the new ones best, but would rather like a space for a log of what I've actually done. I wrote my actual training on last year's schedules, and we like logging don't we... come on RW give us the world
0 ·
Comments
Still not sure what I'm going to follow, making it up as I go along in the meantime.
Are you using these schedules Snicks? How does it fit in with the timing of the Connemarathon?
I like the idea of being given a set number of key sessions to complete in the week rather than following a program set in stone because if you miss a session you feel you have to catch up all the time.
Mind you this approach has been used by "Running Fitness" magazine for a while.
Now applied to do Sheffield full I need some guidance. Was working from the Web sites schedules until the magazine dropped through my front door and now am not to sure. Like the flexibility of the new one but I like to be told what to do when.
So I think I might do a mix of both.
James
So I'm going to make it up as I go along, adding a bit of distance OR upping the quality a bit each week. Which I guess is pretty much what is intended. I also have a shiny new HRM and plan to bring that into use as of tomorrow - so that my runs aren't all single paced trudges.