During my current bout of cross training I have been using my heart rate monitor but as I understand it because certain exercises are not weight bearing (e.g. cycling, rowing) then the "perceived" exertion will be a lot higher than would be suggested by the heart rate data (relative to running calculated maximums).
Does anyone have any more definitve reference points on this - I am keen to make sure my exercise intensity is at the right level but without killing myself!
0 ·
Comments
Doesn't really answer your question does it, but it takes it back to the top!!
Boing!!
Running MHR - 10
Hope that helps
(Funny that cos when people impose targets in my work I hate it.)
Anyway, I agree with WildWill, lower HR for most activites than running. No scientific evidence, just personal perspective.
Precision Heart Rate Training by edmund r burke PhD will tell you more in detail
fergal k (HRM addict)
Running: 192
Rowing: 185
Cycling: 178
Hope this helps