Serious question.
If you are a happily married man, but have huge 50 shades type fantasies but your OH is in no way interested in 'helping' with them. But if someone you know, tells you they are into the same thing, whips chips, chains and dips, (and would be a willing participant) coud you resist the opportunity?
Comments
I see...
We love a bit of Alistair Crowley here..
a serious question??
+1
What flavour dips?
I could resist. That way madness lies.
I'd say that ethically you'd be better off going to a professional dominatrix. At least then you're not colluding with someone who (I'm assuming) is a mutual acquaintance.
I suspect that might be harder to swallow (pun in tended).
This is a tricky one.
I was forever breaking out of the chains when I was a young whippersnapper.
Then again, it might be harder now that I'm older, I'm not as bendy as I used to be.
Oh go on then, I'll give it a go.
But I may have to use an alias,
my wife would give me a good thrashing if she found out.
.
When I say 'ethically' I don;t mean 'ethically' at all. I just mean it might be slightly less terrible than the first option.
I take that the "someone you know" is by implication female? (Only females need apply!)
Well, I've never had those fantasies but if she cares to say to me what she had in mind I would listen and probably think "Why me, do I look the type?". I might be up for a taster session but I would not buy any equipment until I was sure that unrelenting tickling with feathers was not involved.
I find this a bit odd - at the sake of sounding judgemental... if my other half REALLY wanted to do something - it would have to be pretty extreme for me not to want to help out. I thought that was kind of the deal. love honour and whip if required.
after all I insist he lets me draft
You have a head start as you already share an interest in something!
I've never read the book so don't know what 50 shades implies. But if the husband for example wanted to watch Carry on up the Kyber and you preferred to watch the Missionary would you let him watch his if he watched yours first?
My wife says it involves lots of fisting.
Btw, my Mum picked the book up from our kitchen a few weeks ago and tookit home with her, saying 'Ooh, I've been menaing to read this for a while.' It was returned a few weeks later with the further comment 'It's very poorly written, isnt it?'. My Mum is 90, and we're pretty certain she is actually the Queen. It was much funnier than the book.
we've done that.
as long as you wash properly in between it is fine.
I bet Joe Bugners wife didn't enjoy it
Can't speak for the other two but the first book doesn't.
Been there n done that . It's fun for a while, but you struggle to live a whole relationship based in D/s and BDSM.
But honestly, if your wife gives you permission to go for it with someone else then have fun remember safe word if you don't have the balls to ask your wife for permission then no!!
Nice. Honest answer gets that grown up reaction. Come back when you grow up Flob.
I think Flob was refering to your comment being directly under a post about fisting. the suggestion being if you'd just taken a fisting you might not be awfully comfortable running. on the other hand (fnarr) it could mean you were the fister rather than the fistee. Flob you shouldn't jump to conclusions.
Are you a voyeur KK? This comment assumes the standpoint of an observer. If you are a participant and you both fancy each other neither of you care - and neither should anybody else.
miffi in that context.... Ouch!
he is welcome to come and watch me run (ok plod/shuffle along) for around 12 hours tomorrow to see