5ks are ace 360 (from my vast experience of running 2 of them). In the first one I clearly remember thinking 'I'm getting a bit knackered here' then seeing the 4km marker and thinking 'well maybe I can push on a bit'
That does sound reasonable 360. Have you tried putting your 10k into a race prediction calculator. There's one on this site somewhere or try runningforfitness.org.
Someone, possibly FR, suggested trying to see how far you can get at marathon WR pace. Not many people will get past the first 400m I reckon.
Sod the race predictors. I've a new target if McG's best is 22:27!
After the no vomit retch at my last race, I'm a bit wary of pushing it harder. I could have made a right mess of the results page if I'd run that little bit faster.
You didn't have any lucky escapes on Wednseday katie did you?
Comments
I won't be hoping to break 16mins.
22 mins sounds doable.
Someone, possibly FR, suggested trying to see how far you can get at marathon WR pace. Not many people will get past the first 400m I reckon.
22:42=ill all the way round, retching, no follow thro' at the end.
(McG's time is 22:27 so you can always have that as a secondary target.)
One suggestion I heard for 5k strategy was to speed up to and then faster than target pace, so if you want to run 22, then you'd aim for splits of
4:30
4:27
4:24
4:21
4:18
but 'run hard, hold on' seems like a neat tactical summary
(I managed 80m at marathon world record pace <sigh>)
5k's are great. They are so short, it's surprising how soon it's over.
<sigh>
Have i really pushed it?
Maybe Reading could be a first for sub50 and a first for vomiting?
After the no vomit retch at my last race, I'm a bit wary of pushing it harder. I could have made a right mess of the results page if I'd run that little bit faster.
You didn't have any lucky escapes on Wednseday katie did you?
Also slightly disturbed by the fact that I've already been running for over 100 hours this year.
And 183 for September <KAK>
Are you long running with the harriers tomorrow KB?