Options

Marathon on 3 runs per week.

1356728

Comments

  • Options
    Sean

    Thanks for the spreadsheet. I read this article with interest and think I'll definitely give this schedule a go (with a few tweaks). I'll be interested to follow your progress on this thread.

    It's interestng mind, that there was an article in last months (or the one before that) RW which said that "junk" miles weren't junk and some study had proved that. You pays your money and takes your choice I suppose.
  • Options
    I seem to be plagued with injury at present and am seriously thinking about the FIRST plan. Do you think I could use swimming 50 lengths or so as my cross training or do you really need to get in that gym??
  • Options
    Bryn.... but about this time of the season AH often suffers a bit of a dip in form. Is this through lack of mileage?

    BR - I got my hands on Bill Adcocks' book at the weekend:
    "Relationship between best 5000m and average 5km in fastest marathon. Bill Adcocks 1 minute 10 seconds, Paul Tergat 1 minute 58 seconds." Probably less than 60s a mile!
  • Options
    Mike - probably assuming a linear relationship between distances. Adcocks was a marathon specialist who did not train for shorter races.

    I wonder if he bothered tapering and taking a 5000m race seriously, or trained through them?

    To pluck 2 runners out of the air, I have a 1 mile pb of 4:59 and am aiming for 6m/m in a marathon. John Mayock would probably run just over 4 mins for a mile right now, and ~ 2:15 would not be an unreasonable marathon expectation.

    As a matter of interest, how do your times match up?
  • Options
    1500m 4:06.9 - suggests mile time of about 4:25
    3k 8:53
    5k 15:37
    10k 32:08
    10M 53:00
    HM 71:02
    Mar 2:30:31 5:50

    I'm liking that suggestion!

    The standard analysis to measure the fit is to plot log(time) against log(distance), measuring time in decimal minutes. Logs in any base, as long as consistency between the two.

    The plot on excel scatter chart, and calculate the trendline. The gradient is interesteding, but the R-squared value much more telling as to the validity of the trend.

    My figures are 1.0731, which isn't bad given the normally quoted 1.07 or 1.08. The r-squared = 0.9999 shows the relationship is very close.
  • Options
    sorry, my pb time for the marathon is 5:45. Still another 20 seconds a mile to lose hopefully!
  • Options
    Sean. Thanks for the spreadsheet. Heading for Paris but aiming to remain injury free this looks like the schedule for me. Overshot my time at FLM last year by almost an hour but a new training regime and my intention to use gels for the race should help me towards a 3:35 finish.
  • Options
    ahh, it's a 16 week program not a 15, did the 8x400 today so I am already a week behind. Mind you the 10 I did on Sunday was accidently on target.
  • Options
    which'd take you down to between 2:21 and 2:22, which interestingly is where you normally state as being as fast as you think you can get without having to significantly alter your training and more or less taking it on full time?

    4:23 1500m PB 4:42 mile time (roughly)
    9:20 3000m (5:00)
    15:55 5000m (5:07)
    26:50 5 miles (5:22)
    34:23 10000m (5:32)
    57:13 10 miles (5:43)
    77:42 HM (5:56)

    However, 1500, 3k, 10k, and HM PB could all quite easily be revised. In fact in my last 5k race I think I did beat my 3k PB at the 3k mark. HM was in awful conditions and had stomach upsets, 10000 was in hot conditions and a while back, 1500 is just old. 5 mile by a small amount at least as it was done on a net uphill course.

    However unfortunately a minute and 14 seconds between best mile pace and only HM pace! There goes my theory on being well aerobically developed.

    Just to try this with my mate

    best 1500m time : 3:57 (4:15)
    best HM: 1:19:40 (6:05)
    ouch, almost 2 minutes between 1500 and HM.

    Bobby- yes he does tend to and this could be the cause of it. I think unless he devotes more time to running he will eventually be found out. At the moment the fact that he just trains so much is keeping him ahead as he's so much better aerobically and physically developed. His triathlon training probably has him doing the equivalent of a 60-70 mile week. However, now people are getting older and are willing to run 60-70 mile weeks like Geele and lads like Hardy who are coming on strongly, whilst Hickey used to beat them comfortably, they're getting the benefits that Hickey already has and as the training is specific it's doing them more good. He's not made much progress over the last few years really. Ran a 32 minute 10k I think 2 years ago and now only mid 31s.

    That said, he's still a superb athlete and talent and could so easily choose to just run and take some of the pure runners apart.
  • Options
    Hi Sean,

    Thanks for the excel sheet, that's saved me a lot of number crunching and headaches.

    It's also made me feel a little easier about the paces for the long runs as I was worried they were too fast for me but a quick scan of your calcs shows a long run target time that is equal to my current half marathon pace.

    Just out of interest will anyone be blogging their progress with FIRST? I plan to but my training wont start until May as the mara is in September.
  • Options
    I'll probably put a weekly summary up here, unless it starts to bore everyone to tears. Hopefully one or two other people might do the same, and we can compare notes
  • Options
    Interesting concept but who's it for? The paces are far too fast for beginners surely? And it seems that I train slower than recommended for my 10K time even by McMillan standards so this is far off for me. Maybe one for next year since I am getting faster.
  • Options
    Hi Sean - that would be interesting. I'm IM training but this plan follows a lot of similarities with the running part of that.

    However, having plugged my times into your speradsheet the speedwork seems really quick. Would you think this is best suited to someone who is naturally quick and wants to build an endurance base?

    As a lad doing a lot of trackwork those mile splis would have been easy. Now, as a plodder I am not so sure. I've calculated my pace off a 5 miler XC where I raced over 30 secs a mile faster than any recent training and I have not been doing any speedwork.
  • Options
    Sean due to a recurring injury which hates me running 5 plus times a week I'm going to follow this plan. I've picked it up a bit further on as my race is Zurich on 9 April. I'm also IM training so I can do 2 swims and 2/3 cycles a week too which fits well. I'll be interested in your progress.

    I've always felt the key running sessions in any marathon programme were the hard ones and I hope to be proved right but I suspect, like others, it may turn running into a bit of a chore. Hope not.
  • Options
    I am also following the FIRST plan accompanied by swimming, a weight training workout with rowing and some cycling. I'm really looking forward to it. I don't want to risk injury by running five nights a week on top of a busy full time job and cross training, which I think is important to do in any training plan. Its my first marathon - so I'm going to try the FIRST schedule and see how I get on. It seems to make sense to me. Although the speed sessions are hard! But hey ho. Interesting comments from everyone though - what works for some, doesn't work for others. Thanks.
  • Options
    Thanks for the spreadsheet Sean and I for one would def like to see a regular update of your progress on the plan...

  • Options
    Sean - I've fixed the spreadsheet so it does the 400m calculations.

    If you post your e-mail address I'll send it to you to upload (or you can e-mail me your e-mail address, but you'd have to wait until this evening before I can access my home e-mail!).

    And if RW are in need of any Excel work doing, particularly around management information, just let me know..
  • Options
    SoVeryTired - neat. Can't wait :-)

    Tried the 5 mile tempo run today. A question: with the FIRST emphasis on pace, what do we go for? Consistent pace or average over the whole run? I ask because the middle (trail) section of my run was bedevilled by ice and snow trodden into interesting but ankle-wrenching shapes by dog walkers, child walkers, pleasure walkers et al (and I'm not criticising them). I added between 18 secs and 56 secs a kilometre during the mid three kilometres; way slower than the goal pace.
    But I finished in 40 minutes, which is spot on.
    What's the idea? Find a safe but boring road route?
  • Options
    Snapstinget - I was thinking along the same lines.

    I like to do my long runs mainly on footpaths, I thought that depending on how bad/muddy the surface is. That I should add time to the target pace, Is this right and if so how much?

    Sean - thanks for the spreadsheet, was halfway through the calcluations, giving myself a headache before I downloaded. Now all taht is left is to actually do the times....
  • Options
    Snaps - are you using the schedule printed in RW? It sounds like you are. If you go to the FIRST website (cant do links so - http://www.furman.edu/FIRST/) it gives 2 schedules (1 for First timers and 1 which they call 'FIRST to the Finish'. These schedules are much more detailed than the one printed and will probably answer your questions on pace.

    I am following the 'FIRST to the Finish' schedule and did my club run tonight as my 7 mile Tempo run. This was run at Long Tempo (LT) pace which is 10k pace +30 secs so 8:00 min miling for me. There were a few hills in it and it was a good run that actually mapped out to 7.5 miles.

    Rest day tomorrow for me and 15 miles on Saturday.
  • Options
    SVT - many thanks for updating the spreadsheet, have dropped you a line.
  • Options
    Really glad this topic has been posted. I'm planning on doing Berlin in September. As a yoga teacher, my job is pretty physical, and it's sometimes hard to find the residual time/energy for the running get-up-and-go. I did a PB of 3:56 in Dublin in October, but often felt really burnt out trying to run 5 times a week during training. I'd have a good run followed by a real struggle the next day. I'm ALWAYS better when I'm rested.

    Since Dubin, I've only run a few times but am finding myself feeling really fresh and fit. I'm thinking: 1x speed or hill sesh, one time 5-8 mile fartlek and 1x long run might see me through next time (yoga on the two off days)??

    Thanks to whoever posted the full 3 day a week article, too!
  • Options
    Sean - no problem at all. I'll send it to you over the weekend.
  • Options
    (And I should be able to add a choice between miles and kilometres)
  • Options
    SVT - would you? :-)
    ICRAM - I started by downloading the programme from the US RW, then the one from the FIRST site, and now I've got Sean's (hopefully soon to be upgraded with SVT's 400 metres and miles/kilometres yippee).

    I also have Shades' 3-day-week programme; she's also worked out the pace at which I should run; from my last 5 miler she says I can train for a 3:30 marathon but that will have to wait till the autumn; I'm following Sean's for FLM and aiming for 3:40 (based on my Brighton 10k in November).

    I'll probably add to the speedwork as I can already do the reps at the calculated pace without any trouble (touch wood - my chest is still not clear).

    So today I'm going to the gym and tomorrow I've got 12 miles at 5:30 per kilometre (sounds faster in kilometres!).
  • Options
    Anyone got any thoughts on how the slower runner should adjust the pace guides.

    Adding 60 - 75 secs to a 6 min/mile 10K pace is very different to adding 60 - 75 secs to say an 8 min/mile pace. You end up having to do you your long runs faster than your target Marathon pace.

    I did 4:11 for my 1st marathon and just want to creep inside 4 hours at FLM. As a V50 three sessions a week suits me. Last year I found running 4 or 5 times a week for more than 12 weeks too much. I am aiming to do 1 Gym session per week plus a few brisk walks.
  • Options
    OES - you're no "slower" than me! My best time last year was 4.16 (though I did have mitigating circumstances). I am also V50.
    You're probably underestimating yourself.

    Your 10 k time is c.50 minutes? Train for a 3.45 FLM and then see how you feel on the day (and what the weather is like). That's what I did for my first FLM and I did it in 3.59:59 (!) as it got a bit warm for my liking.

  • Options
    Very interesting stuff. I can't remember if I read it here or somewhere else, but someone wrote that they were 44 so "couldn't expect any further improvement on their time". Not true, I hope. I'm also 44 and have a marathon PB of 3 hours 8 minutes, and am determined to duck under 3 hours before I hang up my trainers. Please someone reassure me that this is possible, despite being ancient and over the hill.
  • Options
    Sean et al

    Interesting forum, and thanks for the download. As a V50 runner I'm interested in the FIRST plan as I find less training running works better for me in planning for the marathon.
    And I'm intrigued to see the result in my 9th FLM!

    Enjoy

    Ian
  • Options
    SVT,

    The spreadsheet would be brilliant. I am also training for the FLM, I started to run in around november time so I don't know my 10k race pace. I did the 5 miler this morning in 37' 50'' which I was quite pleased with. Not sure though what pace I should go for on the 12 miler on Sunday. Ideally I would like to aim for between 3.30 and 4 hours but am not sure whether that is completely unfeasible being an complete novice to running.

    Thanks Luc
Sign In or Register to comment.