Options

Talkback: ASICS Target 26.2 Team: Colin

15961636465

Comments

  • Options
    3.35! Had a total shocker post mile 22, was on track till that point but not feeling that great from 15 despite keeping the pace correct. Then bang the cramp kicked in! This time far worse than last year when I stopped 3 times in last 3 miles - I had to stop every 400-600m & got it in all quads & calves. During one such stop nr mile 25 Mrs BLT came past me & finished on 3.33 knocking 12mins off her PB but just outside her 3.30 goal which was an amazing performance. We're getting married in July so I guess I've just written the Best Man speech!

    I stuck to my plan & kept it to 7.30s for first 10k then upped it to 7.20-25 till 15 but it didn't feel right & I had to seriously dig in mentally from 16. Hoped it would just be a bad phase & kept going boosted by friends at 14 & 21 but no...!

    Rob I feel your pain, my performance doesn't seem to match up to my training or HM/10k times so a little bemused. 8 mins slower than last yr PB when I know I'm fitter & faster... Feel ok though as consoled by raising money for my mate's charity, Mrs BLT's performance oh & both of us getting interviewed by Colin Jackson on the BBC in the reunion area - he thought our story was hilarious...which it is! God knows if they used it but I'll look for it tomorrow when I get home!

    Well done everybody for such great performances, dead chuffed for you all & definitely include you in that Rob. We'll feel better in a few days I know it. I did look out for you n the pen but couldnt find you sorry.

    Learnt a huge amount on here so thanks again to all for your contributions!

    BLT
  • Options
    AndyVAndyV ✭✭✭
    Great reports on here folks. Too many to comment on but a few resonate....

    Steve MC: hardcore, you just keep delivering. An example to us all.

    CHS: Get the feeling you have serious potential

    Martin: awesome time. just awesome.

    Rob: In all of my previous mara campaigns (a whopping three admittedly) I've said to friends and family that "i prefer halfs", "i'm just gonna do halfs from now" on etc. Yet a few days after each I've signed up for the next big one. There's something about the mara distance that keeps dragging peeps back. My thoughts on this: a)You get to a pretty good standard where even if you just do halfs you have to put in serious mileage anyway to get PBs. You may as well tag on a mara.b)The really long SLR's give you the fitness enabling half mara pb's (IMO)c)The good and bad mara experiences (had both) teach you to become a better runner. d) you learn from mistakes made in maras whereas in halfs you can get away with mistakes (training, nutrition etc) most of time but not improve as a runner. Mull it over for a few days fella.
  • Options
    Martin HMartin H ✭✭✭

    Rob - Apologies if my comments sounded a bit flippant last night.  Just read them again and didn't really convey what I was trying to say.  Have a few weeks of just going out and enjoying a few runs at a pace you enjoy running at.  Get the mojo back and then decide on whether or not to have another go.  As KR eluded to, there may be some unfinished business and I am sure that you can conquer the distance. Join the sub-3.15 thread and see how you go.  After this week there will probably just be a load of inane chat on there, nothing too serious.

    BLT - The marathon is a cruel mistress.  26 miles is a long way and I am sure that KR will understand what you went through with the cramping.  It looks as though you have taken the fact that Mrs BLT beat you in good humour.  You'll certainly relive it all again in a few months time. 

  • Options
    Martin HMartin H ✭✭✭

    Also, I know that this problem raised it's head a few weeks ago on here. 

    How do I un-ignore someone on here.  I was using my phone on Friday and accidentally ignored someone and I want them back!!!

  • Options
    Yeas this hgas happened a few time to me on my ipod too, I was seeing them have had the lastest post on the list and then there comment wasn't on the forum?. You go to MY fORUM bit above and there is a memebers I am ignroing bit - just unclick them.
  • Options
    Martin HMartin H ✭✭✭
  • Options

    Morning everyone.

    First of all, a massive congrats to Martin. Superb effort. I saw your photo on the Virgin site. Surely a Championship place is within your sites now...? I'm really pleased for you. And don't worry, I thought your comment was pretty funny about whipping it out. That's probably what I should've done.. Lol.

    BLT - I was looking out for you as well, but there seemed to be a few people with white visors. I'm sorry it didn't go quite to plan. It is tough when you know that you've trained well and know that you're in good shape, but it sounds that you've taken it all in the right spirit, which is absolutely right. Well done. 

    Thanks for all your thoughts on whether I should do another marathon. I absolutely love running and have really enjoyed hearing your training and have been very inspired. I want to be faster before I try again. I'd like to be in 1:27 HM shape and then I'll think about it. But I'll definitely join the banter on the 3:15 thread, even though my marathon time is way off this at the moment.

    Here are my splits, aiming for a slower start and then around 7:38 pace: 8:13 (a deliberate slower first mile); 7:45 (again, a deliberate slower than MP); 7:30; 7:38; 7:40; 7:53: 7:45: 7:43: 7:37; 7:43: 7:51: 7:42: 7:44: 7:37: 7:37: 7:01 (mile 16, feeling good but too quick); 7:55: 8:06 (realised my mistake at mile 16 and slowed down a bit for final push at 20); 7:47; 7:35 (mile 20); 8:11; 8:08; 8:10; 7:49 (mile 24 - still feeling good); 8:39 (mile 25 - stopped for a wee... ); 16:23 (mile 26 - couldn't get going again).

    I got to Big Ben, dug in and sprinted the last bit, hitting 6:20 pace at the end according to my splits. I was absolutely determined to get something out of the race, so pushed to beat my PB by a minute. The biggest mystery of all is why my GPS read 26.98 miles. It totally threw my pacing. I wonder if I would've just been better doing 8 m/m until 20 and then pushing on, but not sure that would've done my training justice. 

  • Options

    Well done everyone - especially Martin

    Rob think you may have drunk too much. In warmish conditions and running 26.2 miles, you should almost be mildly dehydrated from 10 miles onwards and should be topping up liquid levels not overloading that you need to stop.

    Is your 16th mile accurate? I lost signal through that tunnel and also briefly at Canary Wharf and the underpass to 24. I was having a differential of 30 seconds between Garmin and actual by about 10th mile so I started pressing watch on the markers so I got a more accurate time.

    Your 5k splits look like you were on for sub 3:30 until 35k so you clearly have the potential for a sub-3:30 with minor adjustments

  • Options
    Cheers Steve. I probably did drink too much, but won't use that as an excuse. You're right that my 5k splits suggested a sub 3:30, which is what I was aiming for as the race went on. Do you think I would've been better off just following the sub 3:30 pacer? I have really listened to your advice about going slower to get a better time, which is why I went for 7:38 than 7:30. That was the right decision, but now I wonder if 8 m/m would've suited me better. It's hard to know and I'm sure that you've seen this situation many times, so it would be interesting to hear an honest assessment of where I should focus my efforts going forward.
  • Options
    Rob, as an indication, I drank 2x500ml before the race, one water and one Lucozade, and then visited the toilets a few times before the start: then drank as I needed to at the race, then had 1x500 lucozade afterwards, and a couple of pints, and I didn't pass water till 4pm.
  • Options
    Hi Rob, your splits looked good and sub 3.30 is deinitely on the cards at least. Looks like it was a bit tougher after 20 miles. I guess the pacing issue is a tough one and can be a fine line sometimes.Your half time certainly suggests near to 3.15 in the future as you are really close to under 90 minutes.
  • Options
    Rob - its a great point that Steve makes about the hydration and like PMJ i never pee after the start of a marathon until a few hours after the finish which includes post race drinks so you clearly drank too much on the route - also, as KR says, once you stop still at that distance for 30 seconds it makes getting going again really difficult.  These seem to be 2 points which can be very easily put right for next time and which have little bearing on your training and are more race tactics. Reckon you would have made your target with a 10 minute last mile. 
  • Options

    You are capable of 3:15 soon so 3:30 was doable this time - your pacing seems ok to me other than that 7:05 mile which may not be accurate - maybe try one longer slower run next time (24M)  and try and get the half time slightly faster. If you had a slower half PB then maybe 8 min miles would be better but with your half time, 7:45s should feel comfortable and don't think it would have made a huge difference.

    I managed 6:45 miles for most of way yesterday (bit quicker in first 5k)  but only could do about 6:20s in my half-marathon so wasn't that comfortable in marathon at any stage but have 35 years of marathoning and was reasonably determined to break three to prove I still have the right to suggest to other people how to possibly prepare!

  • Options
    MinniMinni ✭✭✭
    Rob - I measured 26.78 in my garmin. It definitely got confused in a few places and had my running odd paces, which I knew weren't right. I think we probably ran much closer to 26.2 than our garmins would have us believe.

    It sounds like you were well on target until 24 and that's a bad time to stop. I'm sure that won't happen again - just one of those things. I had a gel disaster (lost all but one) and had to take a Lucozade, which didn't agree with me so had to make a pit stop at mile 21. Finished 3:20.40 which is an 8 minute pb so very pleased.

    Well done Steve!

  • Options
    Steve Marathon Coach wrote (see)

    and was reasonably determined to break three to prove I still have the right to suggest to other people how to possibly prepare!

    Steve, if you were sitting in a chair with drinking tea and wearing your slippers it would still be worth a listen to you. Over the years I have learned so much by listening to people who have been there and done it. Odd thing is that you find them in the oddest of places, so in the clubs where I have been a member I have found people who were world record holders, and sub 50 minute 10 milers, etc etc, who come out at a weekend and rake the jump pit just to be of a help.
  • Options
    Second that sentiment!

    I had a bit of a mare and came in at 4:06:53.

    Must have been the beetroot juice!

    Very well done to all.
  • Options

    PMJ - first of all, well done on your PB. A fantastic time and I'm delighted that you made your target. You really deserved that. I have a lot to learn about race tactics and I'm obviously drinking far too much. I hadn't considered that until today.

    Oscarr - thanks. I'm sure that's right. It's a fine line and the marathon, as I have learned, is not just about how fit you are. There are many different factors that determine the outcome.

    Minni - a fantastic PB. Very well deserved and I'm impressed that you made such a great time despite your pit stop. 

    AndyV - you are right about the training required for a fast HM being almost up there with a marathon. I think that's what drew me to running the marathon in the first place, to be honest. 

    KR - there have been many people on here with similar HM times and very different marathon times, so you're right that it's a fine line. I found it easier this year than last from 20-23 miles, but the last two were just as hard as last year.

    Steve - I don't think you need to run sub 3 to prove your credentials. I agree with PMJ that we're very lucky to have someone of your calibre on this forum. Thank you for your insights. My first focus will be the HM. I need to improve my speed with better interval sessions and build on my improvements with the tempo sessions. I'll get there... 

  • Options
    Martin HMartin H ✭✭✭

    Minni - I also had gel issues.  I carried 5, the 3 I opened all exploded over my face, then made me wretch after taking them.  I threw the last two.

    Rob - Agree with the hydration.  I think that I only took water from every other water station at most and only had a few sips from each bottle.  I had one sports drink but threw it after a third of a bottle. I also didn't take anything after 20 or 21 miles.  I take virtually no fluid on training runs so know that I don't need much in races.  I drank 500ml of cherry juice, 500ml of water and my can of London Pride at the end and went toilet about 4.30 for the first time.

    Steve - If you never run sub-3 again you will still have the knowledge of how to do it.  Coaching is not always about being able to do it.  It is about imparting knowledge.

  • Options
    Wow, it's been busy on here while I've been away!

    Perfectly paced effort from me gave me a 28 second negative split for 3.08.58. 1 minute and 1 second under my target and a shiny new PB.

    My Garmin went completely loopy in the underpasses and lost signal, so it looks like I ran 26.85 miles, but I know I didn't as I certainly didn't run a full mile at 5.48 pace for mile 25!

    Nice to see Steve at the Expo, although I nearly didn't see him as I was wondering around in a daze. Actually I was looking for the Athletics Weekly stand and completely failed to notice it, so it's a good job that Steve spotted me, since he was actually on that stand.

    I opted for the Beet It Endurance Shots this time round. More portable and much smaller so the nasty taste is over so much sooner;)
  • Options
    PCleasbyPCleasby ✭✭✭
    A new PB for me of 3:07. I managed to run 26.7 miles. How did I do that. I know Canary Wharf, tunnels and the Garmin don't mix but even by mile 3 I found my mile laps going off 300 yards before the mile marker, weird. Had to rely on the pace band.

    Anyway, a reasonably comfortable and controlled effort from me, struggled to keep the pace down in the first 4 miles mainly due to the press of bodies and some down hill sections.

    What shocked me was the noise of the crowd. I've never run in an event like it. Amazing support but I did wonder whether it could be a little distracting for those who need to focus precisely on their run.

    Still I loved the whole event and knocked 6.5 mins off my pb finally gaining a GFA grading.
  • Options

    Minni - Keyboard - Speedy - PMJ - great PBs , well done to you all

    Steve - if you never ran another mile you would still be the same excellant coach and one a lot of people would still listen to

  • Options

    well done on all those other PBs - Minni, Keybaord, Speedy (well done on disclipline and negative split), PMJ

    yes I know I don't have really have to do any more for people to listen but I find it helps to put some of minor pressure to acheive a target but now I have a 35 plus year span (Oct 76-Apr 12) between my first and last sub-3, it won't matter if it doesn't extend further.  

    Maybe unlikeIy but I still hope to be fitter and healthier next year and lighter - I was a stone heavier than I was when I ran 2:43 a few years ago!

    My namesake beat me for first time in 26 years though and shame I couldn't have been fitter then I could have ran with him. We were the only two Smythe's in whole race and same first and middle name and same club and both sub-3!

  • Options
    Brilliant statistic Steve. As you are a man of stats, do you know of anyone else who has achieved the same number of sub 3 times over that period.
    Well done on your PB Speedy (knew you'd do it), Minni & Keyboard W! It's great to hear of all the stories, times and the effort that everyone has quite obviously put into their marathons - a lot of lessons (good & bad) have been learnt!
  • Options
    knight rider wrote (see)
    Brilliant statistic Steve. As you are a man of stats, do you know of anyone else who has achieved the same number of sub 3 times over that period.
    I have been told that Chris Finill has done all and he is here in a write up and here in more detail. I copy and paste from the last one, make that 32 now with a 2:50:32.

    Chris Finill, Harrow AC
    • Has run sub 3 hours in 5 decades - 1970s to 2010s.
    • Represented England/ Great Britain 14 times at 100k or 24 hour ultra distance events.
    • 14th World 100k Championships, Taiwan, 2003.
    • Ran across America from California to New York in the Fall of 2011 in 79 days 22 hours.
    • Guinness World Record holder for consecutive sub 3 hour marathons - 31 at London, 1981 to 2011.
  • Options

    Rob- glad you can reflect and be philosophical about things. Re Garmins - I don't think I've ever done a race when the Garmin hasn't measured slightly long. Hence they can't be trusted to within 2 or 3 per cent for accurate paces. Clearly it means that all the paces we think we're achieving in training are correspondingly a bit slower in reality than they appear too(slightly depressingly!)

    I have a sneaking suspicion you'll be toeing the line with another sub3 at the back of your mind next year Steve !

  • Options
    Fraser - it could be that we don't run the shortest route around the course and so a few extra 5 metres on the wrong lines around the bends every mile over 26 miles may add up to an extra 0.2 miles or so at the end.
  • Options
    I'm sure that's part of it Oscarr. I believe there's an also an inbuilt margin of error in the way GPS works (something to do with measuring lots of points presumed to be joined up with straight lines) which results in them under estimating distance and over estimating pace. I'm sure there's a tecchie link to it on the sub3 thread somewhere....
  • Options
    Just caught an article on a TV programme called Bang Goes the Theory where they tested the effects of Beetroot juice. The fella went and did a max effort cycle to exhaustion, went away overnight, had a Beetroot juice shot with breakfast, went back and did the test again. He cycled for 17% longer.
  • Options
    Martin HMartin H ✭✭✭
    My garmin measured 26.43m yesterday.  I was bored at work today and worked out the time taken per mile against my pace per mile.  Had it been 26.2 exactly I would have finished in 2.48.25.  However, I know that as much as I wanted to, I couldn't keep to the blue line due to having to overtake slower runners.  A yard here and there soon add up over the course of a marathon.
Sign In or Register to comment.